scientific double blinded cable test

Sorry to disabuse anyone of the belief that blind tests mean anything. Especially if the results are negative. Would anyone expect anything of value to materialize when a bunch of giggling skeptics get together for a blind test? 🤡 Furthermore it’s highly unlikely that in ideal situations, you know, good ears and good equipment, that no differences would be observed as there is almost always some audible difference in the sound.

For the millionth time, why does everybody ignore the fact that the Aczel crowd never maintained that all cables sound the same. Their theory was that all differences between cables are due solely to inductance, resistance and capacitance values, which are easily measured and can drastically change the frequency response of a speaker. So, yes - cables with the same LCR values will sound the same. So they maintain. Whether it’s true or not is another story.

Too many variables: source - preamp - amp - speakers! Even in the simplest setup, say, Oppo - Quad amp - Quad ESL's the need for an IC introduces a variable (of unknown quality) before the speaker cable testing can begin! We need to know what effect the IC (variable A) has before we can test the speaker cable (variable B). 

Heisingberg's Uncertainty Principle at work here on the Macro level!

Gordon Ramsey conducts a really interesting blind test with food that I've seen him do on some of his shows.  He'll blindfold chefs, then put various foods in their mouths and have them try to guess what it is.  People are wrong more than they are right.  They miss things like Watermelon, Chicken, Green Beans etc.  It's amazing.  Based on this, is it safe to assume that foods don't have a discernible unique taste?