subwoofer question......what size sub ?

OK. I agree that a dipole sub is a great idea (looked hard for one but could not find one at the time). However, why does a dipole sub benefit from stereo where an ordinary one does not? Deep bass is not directional, and the advantage of equalzing in mono is that the two subs even each other out more effectively. This really is an open question out of curiosity.
I am just occasionally toying with the idea of getting these dipole subs, but I am not in the US, and they also seem rather large compared to the B&W PV1d that my wife finds only just tolerable (and perhaps rightly so), given that we already have the large Quad electrostats.

I don't want to hijack addyson815's post, as he's looking for help with his Proacs.

My issue, is not about the virtues of stereo vs mono configurations. Instead, my concern, as bdp24 has touched on, is how the Antimode may interfere with patented circuitry used for control between my subs and amps. As the Antimode takes control of certain features in sub amps, will that defeat the manufacturer's patented circuitry? I will reach out to Danny of GR Research and also DSPeaker for their thoughts.
Kenny

That makes sense. I have been very pleased with the response from DSPeaker's engineers in Finland. I called them on the phone, and they took their time to explain what I could expect and what I needed (and what I did not need, even if it was more expensive).

@willemj

your first reply regarding using a sealed sub vs a ported sub and other info was good info.....and after that , it was basically a conversation between you and " kennythekey" regarding the Antimode 8033.

Not sure how any of what you two discussed helps me ?

Please explain.

and kennythekey even says this :

"  I don't want to hijack addyson815's post, as he's looking for help with his Proacs.  "