scientific double blinded cable test

gdhal"I thought we already discussed the matter and were to proceed to the next step. My attorney will create the necessary protective umbrella for me, and presumably your attorney will create a protective umbrella for you."
This is completely not true the next step is to design the means by which the test will be conducted the place the test will be conducted the associated equipment that will be used with the test to be conducted the proctors to the test that we will have conducted and how the public will both be able to participate in the test to be conducted and/or witness for themselves the test to be conducted those are some of the preliminary matters that remain to be resolved and these will be reviewed, discussed, negotiated and agreed upon here in public or otherwise your $25,000 USD offer is ovbiously not sincere and you have undertaken the means to extricate yourself so which is it. Do you want to discuss this plan here or move it into the shadows and darkness where you can "chicken" out and then blame the outcome on someone other than yourself?

A couple of things if I can be so bold. All cables used in the test should have at least 200 hours of break in. Preferably using a break in machine but break in using music is acceptable. All connectors should be cleaned and wiped dry. The test system used should be checked for correct Polarity using XLO Test CD, in phase and out of phase track. Preferably the source(s) CDs or whatever should also be checked for correct Polarity. The source should be familiar to the listener. The system should also be familiar to the listener. He should perhaps be allowed to use his own CDs for the test. At a minimum the listener should be allowed to familiarize himself with the sound of the test system prior to testing. Kind of like warm up pitches in baseball. Loudness should be controlled. Time of day should be controlled. Early morning on weekends is best, or late at night. Testing during bad weather should be avoided. The number of consecutive tests that must be passed should be minimized. The number of people allowed in the room should be kept at a minimum.

This is completely not true the next step is to design the means by which the test will be conducted the place the test will be conducted the associated equipment that will be used with the test to be conducted the proctors to the test that we will have conducted and how the public will both be able to participate in the test to be conducted and/or witness for themselves the test to be conducted those are some of the preliminary matters that remain to be resolved and these will be reviewed, discussed, negotiated and agreed upon here in public or otherwise your $25,000 USD offer is ovbiously not sincere and you have undertaken the means to extricate yourself so which is it. Do you want to discuss this plan here or move it into the shadows and darkness where you can "chicken" out and then blame the outcome on someone other than yourself?

@clearthink

The idea of meeting with your first via skype is so I can gain a sense as to whether or not we could ever attain an agreement. Essentially saving myself the time and effort of needing to endlessly respond to your posts. Also, keep in mind that even if we do agree to terms, our attorneys need to set it to legal language. And, if your in another country that in itself can be an arduous process as laws are different. But in absence of skype meeting, I of course remain interested in reading here on the forum whatever else you can propose. 

@geoffkait 

I thought we already established the cable is Belden 5T00UP speaker wire. 

The waffling continues ...