what happened to the post on the sat tonearm?


I am curious to what was wrong with that discussion.  people are not allowed to have their opinion on things?  geez
tzh21y
Insults; veiled insults; accusations of delusion, snake-oil and voodoo; all proselytized and prosecuted with the zeal of a fundamentalist savior. Such posts derail threads and discourage conversation. I applaud moderators for exercising good judgment in deleting posts and threads. Note that the very post above this one does nothing to further the conversation. It's just snide.  
Raul was just saying it like it is. It's a bad tonearm. Its geometry produces higher distortion than any other tonearm. It's absurdly priced. 

I don't believe that morality and prices mix well. Well that at least

some ethics is involved in our mutual opinions exchange. We should

not insult each other. But teasing each other is different matter (grin).


Dear @downunder : Sorry but I’m not insulting any one in that thread. What I did it is only to describe facts and between those facts the MAIN RESPONSABILITY THAT HAVE ANY PROFESSIONAL REVIEWER FROM WHERE WE LEARN and this main responsability means that they are obligated to give us audiophiles that are the ones that put our money for all the audio industry can survive: GOT THIS? the RIGTH INFORMATION and if those reviewers or manufacturers are ignorant oer just they do not cares about then that’s a kind of corruption because all them are PUBLIC people and can’t be untochables but the other way around. GOT this too?. That’s their work and all of them make money ( our money. ) for do that so I can claim to all of them about because I pay for.

Look there were 70 audiophiles that bougth that item because those ignorant reviewers, this is the AHEE all belongs to.

That you are satisfied with does not means every one be that way and certainly I’m not. So a PUBLIC person as is the President/Minister of your country: can you say in public that he is doing a bad job with the nation security? or you have to stay mouth close because it’s an " insult " to dos that ! ! ? ?  and the reviewers are PUBLIC persons.

Btw, if it’s true that Mr. Fremer was not very happy when I posted about in his thread I have to say, because we had a very hot discussion about, that he had the maturity to not deleted and for this attitude my " hat off ".


Regards and enjoy the MUSIC NOT DISTORTIONS,
R.
Post removed