phomchick"Peter’s article seems correct to me, though it is a bit excessively emphatic in some of its points."
And yet their is no proofs that is the problem with the naysayers and self-proclaimed objectivists the burden of "proofs" always fall to a party other than themselves and that is what is so strange about they're claims!
I'm not sure I follow this exactly, but if you are saying that the naysayers never have proof for their doubts, then:
- You can never prove a negative
- If you are making unusual or extraordinary claims, the burden of proof rests with you. That should be obvious.
- If you want to prove to me that $1,000 AC power cords sound better, you have to do two things: a) come up with a believable explanation of why it should sound better, and b) prove that you and others can reliably tell the difference with an A/B/X test.