A-V receiver power ratings

Pdn ;
The examples , that I used above , were theory only .
While it is desireable to find high-er amperage amps you do not necessarily need to have lower voltage to go with it . It will probably be difficult to find these specs in any brochure that you may find available . That is why it was suggested to look at the wattage output into 8 ohms and compare it to the output into 4 ohms , the doubling down thing .

As far as the transformer types , I don't know . Maybe someone more knowledable than I could answer that question .

I am also not knowledeable as to what manufacturers would offer an A/V receiver that would doubledown the wattages .
Keep in mind that it costs more money to build an amp that will do this . How much do you want to spend ?

Most audiophiles seeking this type of power will go with seperates , an A/V processor called a pre/pro and a seperate 5,6, or 7 channel amp or a combination of amps to achieve the necessary amount of channels . Again , the cost can increase rapidly ! I doubt that you will find an A/V receiver that will put out this kind of power at any of the BB , CC or discount warehouses .

All is not lost though . Remember the other way to achieve workability , or synergy , is to select speakers that will work with the kind of power that the less exspensive A/V receivers will give you . This is usually a cheaper approach to take .

Unless you want to build a system for multi-channel music , the important speakers will be the front ones ,left , right and center . The rear or sound effects speakers won't need to be as efficient or of as high of quality . Just match the tonality of the fronts so that the voices will sound the same all around . You can use the level adjustment , in the processor , to compensate for less efficient rears and make the loudness equal to the fronts .

Good luck .

Volts x Amps = Watts, and from a purely mathematical standpoint, 100 volts at 5 amps is 500 watts - as is 5 volts at 100 amps as mentioned by Saki70.

The problem is that you can't just arbitrarily mix the volts and the amps and end up with the same results from your amp. There is the factor of the speaker impedance that dictates how much current will flow in the circuit. An amplifer does not push current to the speaker, the speaker draws current from the amp. This all works through the basic principles of Ohm's Law (E=IxR).

An amplifer tries to operate as a voltage source/voltage amp. This means that the amplifer will try to deliver the same voltage output (volume position notwithstanding) as the speaker impedance decreases (lower impedance = higher load = more current necessary).

In other words, if an amp is designed to deliver 100wpc @ 8 ohms, it will need to put out roughly 28 volts. This 28 volts into an impedance of 8 ohms will cause roughly 3.5 amps of current to flow. If the voltage and impedance variables do not change, then 3.5A is all that will every flow in this circuit. The amplifier cannot and will not force more current to be in the circuit than Ohm's Law dictates.

Since output power at 8 ohms is the typical basic rating, the amplifier mfg has designed the power supply voltage rails to support 100w at 8 ohms (28V and at least 3.5A) At 8 ohms, the power output is typically limited by the available voltage from the power supply rails, not the current.

When a 4 ohm speaker is substitued for the 8 ohm speaker, the "100w" amplifer in our example still tries to deliver 28V to the 4 ohm load. If the power supply is robust enough to fully deliver the higher current (about 7 amps) dictated by the lower 4 ohm load, the power delivered would be 200w - or double the 8 ohm rating. This is the "doubling down" effect often mentioned in amplifer discussions.

However, if the amplifer's power supply cannot fully satisfy the current demand of the lower impedance load, it's output voltage will sag. The inability of the power supply to deliver enough current and the resultant sag of the output voltage under load is why most amps and receivers don't double down as the impedance drops.

Also, it is my opinion that having all channels driven for a HT receiver is a bit of a red herring. Sure, it's likely to indicate a more robust power supply and amplifier, however it's not a guarantee of superior sound quality.

Further, it would be a VERY rare, if ever, that any HT source material will require maximum output on all channels at the same time. Of course, if you play continuous test tones at excruciating levels through your system, that's a different story.

Thanks everyone. Very good explanations and information. Appreciate it.