The new Synergistic Research BLUE fuses ....
Actually it’s not true that carefully agreed terms of the test procedure ensure a valid test. As I’ve oft explained, the reasons why a blind test OR ANY TEST can go wrong are sometimes BEYOND the control of either party or any lawyers that might be involved. Especially when they are not test experts. It’s completely naive to believe that a negative result of a blind test, even one that is very thorough and agreed to, proves anything. In fact I’d go so far as to say anyone who suggests a blind test for an audio tweak is either naive or scheming. The threat of a blind test is simply a ruse, a ploy, a rather obvious one, used by naysayers to browbeat people into doubting what they believe or hear or to subject a controversial product to doubt and ridicule. Putting up money on the test only adds to the absurdity of the whole thing. The test hasn’t even taken place and the naysayer already knows the result? Come on, people! Wise up! Geoff Kait Machina Dynamica The difficult we do rapidly, the impossible takes a little longer |
geoffkait The threat of a blind test is simply a ruse, a ploy, a rather obvious one, used by naysayers to browbeat people into doubting what they believe or hear or to subject a controversial product to doubt and ridicule. Putting up money on the testvonly adds to the absurdity of the whole thing. The test hasn’t even taken place and the naysayer already knows the result?Yes, he knew what the "test" result would be advance because it was rigged, like three-card monte. That’s why he was willing to wager $25K on it, and why he continues to promote it on this forum. Of course, gdhal will respond by saying he’s not promoting the $25K challenge but only "offering" it. No matter. It’s a ruse. |
| Post removed |
