High Fidelity Cables MC-0.5 Waveguide and Total Contact


There seems to be some kind of synergy going on with these two products. I have one MC-0.5 plugged into the wall duplex that feeds my system. When I got it initially, I was very pleased with the results. Later, when I decided to try Total Contact, the first thing I treated was the three prongs on the MC-0.5. Again, I was very happy with the further improvements I heard.


Recently, Tim Mrock, the inventor of TC, suggested I paint the outside of the MC-0.5 with it. At first I thought “Wow, that's kind of crazy!”, but Tim has not steered me wrong yet. I went ahead and painted it, in place, without removing it from the wall. I experienced an immediate and obvious increase in transparency and clarity. Initially, the top end was a little too lively, but that has settled down over a day or two, and I am now one happy camper 😀


I don't know how, or why, this works, but I am loving the results.


tommylion
Ok, since no one was willing (including perfectpathtech) to come forth with an answer to my question with respect to the cost of Total Contact, I decided to do my own research into graphene; graphene production and production costs. Here are some of my notes:

The quality of graphene affects the price.

At the end of 2015, the market price of graphene was about $100 per gram (1 gram = 1 milliliter).

Once the method of production is optimized and scaled up, the cost of graphene is expected to come down.

Deloitte Global predicts the total value of the graphene materials market in 2016 is likely to be in the low tens of millions of dollars, which is less than an hour’s projected revenues from smartphone sales. Graphene has been called a ‘wonder material’, as it offers an unrivalled combination of tensile, electrical, thermal and optical properties. Yet, it may be decades before this material’s potential is fully realized.

It is important to note that many of the most impactful materials have taken decades before attaining mainstream adoption. In 2016, graphene-enhanced products are only going to offer a glimpse of the material’s full potential, but a key point to consider is that new materials disrupt existing products and lead to new technologies.

https://investingnews.com/daily/tech-investing/graphene-investing/graphene-cost

http://www.visualcapitalist.com/graphene-material-future

Conclusion:

Graphene is no flash in the pan, here today gone tomorrow substance.

Scientists have been studying and conducting research for years (since 1962).

There is continuing global R&D into various product development applications.

Mad Scientist Audio has marketed and sells a similar graphene based product that for $79 per 10 ml bottle seems reasonably priced.
How it compares to TC, I cannot say.

As for me, I would like to take a wait and see approach with respect to Total Contact. Perhaps once the marketing effort matures and product penetration moves beyond sales on Audiogon to a wider audience, I’ll take another look.
Like all audio products it’s customary to correlate price to performance, also taking into consideration effort/difficulty and cost of fabrication, perhaps marketing, sometimes but not always cost and effort of development. Supply and demand. Competition. But mostly performance. Who cares how much it costs to develop and make and market a product that’s mediocre in performance?
I don't mind how ppl.  use the forum.  But i get tired
Of seeing one person's name on every topic. 
All the time.