Bi-amping vs. bridging


Good day.  I am wondering what everyone thinks about bi-amping a dual port speaker vs. bridging the output on the amp to double the wattage.  I have a reasonably sweet Rotel 6 channel delivering 50 watts into all 6 channels (6 channels driven) but have the option of bridging the outputs and using a single teminal on the speakers.  I have a pair of Kef IQ5's, but will be taking delivery on some Martin Logan Motion 20's.  What do y'all think?  Best option?
wisciman99
Good stuff for sure Al.  Thanks for the insight.  My pre/pro is the Marantz AV-7005.  It's handling the bi-amping of the Kef's at the moment, without any issues I'm aware of.  I have yet to place the ML's into the mix.  So, should I be using the Front High or Front Wide for the second channel for the tweets?
Follow up: I know that the Surround Back is commonly used, but I have surround back speakers so that option is off the table.
... should I be using the Front High or Front Wide for the second channel for the tweets?
I have no experience with av pre/pros, and perhaps someone who does will chime in and address this question. But as I see it what matters, assuming that the goal is accurate behavior of the amp/speaker combination, is simply that the signals provided to the two sections of the speaker (and therefore to the two corresponding channels of the amp) should be identical.

Best of luck with the new speakers! Regards,
-- Al
When you bridge you need to be careful of the amp manufacturer's specifications.

Usually they provide a minimum speaker impedance when bridging, which is 2x or more the minimum when un-bridged. It's all math, but as mentioned before when you bridge:

2x Max Voltage, therefore:
4x Power (at 8 Ohms) (since P proportional to V squared).

The increase in power is limited in large part by the thermal dissipation of the amplifier. 

Will you gain much? Meh. It takes 10x the power output to double the apparent volume (10dB). You'll only gain about 6 dB this way.

Bi-amping (without a crossover) is also kind of limited, but with weak power supplies can bring out a lot. Since the current for bass notes is now separate, the power supplies are stiffer, and you may experience more dynamic, faster and less muddy amplifier this way.  However this implies you have a separate power supply. With a multi-channel amp, this benefit is less clear.

Bi-amping WITH a crossover is where the magic, and complications lie. :) Best left to experts and active speaker makers.

Assuming your amplifier is spec'd for bridging with your speakers, I'd encourage you to try both and see if you find one you like best.

Best,

E
Gah, I meant to say:

The increase in the minimum impedance requirement when bridged is related to the maximum safe thermal dissipation of the amplifier, in watts.

This is the same reason why most power amps won't support 2 Ohms. The power dissipation needed would cause a thermal meltdown. Hopefully your amp will shut off before this happens! 

Best,

E