uberwaltz,
Either you have trouble communicating...or you are just desperate to disavow what you even wrote.
What I wrote:
Let's see if this description is apt. What you wrote:
P1:
^^^ Identified the people you are talking about in the post, and beginning a critique of the relevance of their findings.
P2:
^^^^ Talking about those same people and criticising them for drawing arrogant, absolutist conclusions.
P4:
^^^^ Clearly continuing your critique of the people making such posts, such as you referenced in your first two paragraphs.
So, yeah, 3 of your 4 paragraphs were obviously, undeniably, concerned with the people you claim have made blustering claims about "impossible" improvements. (Which is why I asked for evidence they were making such claims).
I don't see what you mean to gain by denying the obvious content of your own posts (why not just support what you wrote?), but the internet is strange that way.
Either you have trouble communicating...or you are just desperate to disavow what you even wrote.
What I wrote:
prof: So...3 of your 4 paragraphs specifically referenced the people who tested fuses, didn’t hear a difference and you criticized those posters for making "blustering" posts with absolute statements that it’s "impossible" to hear an improvement.
Let's see if this description is apt. What you wrote:
P1:
I totally understand and respect those here who have tried an aftermarket fuse and garnered no discernible sq change. Kudos to those few.However that was still in their room with their equipment and to their ears, which is still highly subjective.
^^^ Identified the people you are talking about in the post, and beginning a critique of the relevance of their findings.
P2:
So said testers simply CANNOT take the stance that because they did not hear an improvement then absolutely nobody else can or should!
That is utter nonsense and arrogance beyond belief.
^^^^ Talking about those same people and criticising them for drawing arrogant, absolutist conclusions.
P4:
So we need to quit with the blustering posts that proclaim it is a fact that it is impossible to hear an improvement!
^^^^ Clearly continuing your critique of the people making such posts, such as you referenced in your first two paragraphs.
So, yeah, 3 of your 4 paragraphs were obviously, undeniably, concerned with the people you claim have made blustering claims about "impossible" improvements. (Which is why I asked for evidence they were making such claims).
I don't see what you mean to gain by denying the obvious content of your own posts (why not just support what you wrote?), but the internet is strange that way.