Thiel Owners

just wanted to let everyone know i just posted my 2.7's for sale.  it was a tough call between them and the new 3.7's (my girlfriend likes the 2.7's better),  but ultimately i think the 3.7's are a better speaker. 

ronkent,
Beautiful looking speakers!  Someone will be lucky to get them.What does your your girlfriend like better about the 2.7s?  Is it just a size, design thing?  Or does she actually prefer the way they sound?
For me the 2.7s is a nicer looking design than the 3.7s and I figured my wife would agree.  But I was surprised that she actually liked the looks of the 3.7 a bit better. 

Not me though.  I think my 2.7s are just about the nicest looking speaker I've ever seen and finding them in ebony was such a rare occurrence, and I got them for such a great price, I don't think I'll ever let these go.  Even if I bring in another speaker to play with.
I've had the 3.7s out of my system for so long it's helped me "forget" to some degree the ways in which they are obviously better.  I don't want to do any more comparisons, and my 3.7s are ready to sell.  I'm just trying to decide if I'm going to sell them myself or take a trade in from a local dealer for another pair of speakers (Devore Fidelity).

BTW, I see a subwoofer in your set up.  Did you have any trouble mating it with the 2.7s?  And how did you go about doing so?
I've had my JL 110E subwoofers for a long time and STILL haven't got around to giving another try to mate them with the 2.7s.  It just seems such a damned complex undertaking once it involves cross-overs etc.Feels like I'm trying to re-design a speaker.

hi Prof,  boy it has been an interesting six weeks since i first got them.   first week or so, they were not very good.  they have improved enough that i prefer the sound of them over the 2.7's. for a point of reference i would assign the 2.7's a sound quality of 8.  at first the 3.7's were about a six as they were bright and one dimensional.  now they are at 8.5 and improving as they were essentially new speakers,  and from all that i have read,  they need 200 plus hours to really start sounding their best.

 they seem to be more extended, accurate,  and less congested.  that said,  i could live happily with the 2.7's. and i do like the more compact size and looks better on them as well.   my girlfriend likes the "warmer/sweeter" sound of them but i think she likes the bit of mid bass bloom that the bigger ones do not seem to have.   overall two awesome speakers and you are right,  in that whoever gets my 2.7's,  is going to be very lucky.

the sub is an REL S/5 and i really like what it adds.    seemed to mate well after playing with room placement and the settings.   Paul at PS Audio is who turned me on to them.   They are his faves as well.  they are very easy to hook up,   just run their cable from the outputs of the amp right to the REL using their special connector. 

ronkent,
Yes I've commented on the mid-bass bloom of the 2.7s as well.  It can really add some nice punch and warmth in many cases, and a dynamic feel.  And for the most part it does it invisibly.   But certain tracks can really zone in on that hump and then I hear it thrumming, getting confused.
Fortunately this doesn't happen very often and so most of the time the 2.7s sound to me superbly defined and controlled.  They are a dream speaker for electronic music - the imaging, palpability, punch, control, gorgeous tone. 

But the 3.7s do sound more linear and a touch more open in the midrange.