I think the attitude exhibited by the author of the opening post is arrogant and condescending and close-minded. But he is very well aware of that.
I would have expected that 50 years of time in this hobby would have produced more questions and circumspection, and less dogma and certainty. But this opening post proves once again that age is not highly correlated with wisdom.
He certainly is entitled to his subjective, personal opinion, as are we all. I respect his personal opinion. At the highest level of audio reproduction he likely has experienced I might also have arrived at those incorrect conclusions. (Though I certainly would not proffer them as immutable facts.)
His utter dismissal of analog recording and reproduction, and his “assumption” of digital recording and reproduction, informs me that whatever audio hobby he thinks he is engaged in, he in not engaged in the hobby of high-end audio. His opinions evidence a lack of experience with the best the hobby of high-end audio can produce.
I would have expected that 50 years of time in this hobby would have produced more questions and circumspection, and less dogma and certainty. But this opening post proves once again that age is not highly correlated with wisdom.
He certainly is entitled to his subjective, personal opinion, as are we all. I respect his personal opinion. At the highest level of audio reproduction he likely has experienced I might also have arrived at those incorrect conclusions. (Though I certainly would not proffer them as immutable facts.)
His utter dismissal of analog recording and reproduction, and his “assumption” of digital recording and reproduction, informs me that whatever audio hobby he thinks he is engaged in, he in not engaged in the hobby of high-end audio. His opinions evidence a lack of experience with the best the hobby of high-end audio can produce.