@charles1dad
+1 it doesn’t get much better than this...I bet both sound sublime yet one will be preferred by a listener.
+1 it doesn’t get much better than this...I bet both sound sublime yet one will be preferred by a listener.
Time to report back on my experiment with comparing the Vivaldi DAC direct vs via my ARC Ref 40 preamp. The full description of my setup can be found in my virtual system but the key things today is that we were comparing two different analog outputs from the DAC to my VTL MB450III Path A was my usual setup
And Path B was direct
The DAC is set at 0.6V output and the VTL has 0.775V input sensitivity All levels were matched using pink noise (Stereophile test CD2 track 15) and incidentally my listening levels for the tracks were between 9.5dB and 14dB cut on the DAC Four tracks were used for comparison, all CDs 16/44.1 upsampled to DSDx2
All are tracks I know intimately Overall it was an interesting experience with as some have suggested two different presentations. If I use Path A (via ARC) as my reference the direct route was in comparison definitely more analytical, arguably clearer but with some important caveats On the plus side
But a number of significant negatives
I can understand that others may prefer the direct path, arguably my Magicos sounded more like classic Magicos going this way that's fine, and also bear in mind that my entire system is built and optimized around including the pre-amp |
@folkfreak Yup - ARC preamps tend to add depth to the Soundstage. I have heard the difference myself on an ARC Ref 6. I think the tubes do it as my Mcintosh tube preamp does the same vs SS. I know there is added harmonics (in minuscule quantity with ARC) and McIntosh is even more lush or warm than ARC. At the end of the day it is what works for the listener - lose some resolution but gain some musicality! |