Interconnects and non-believers


For anyone who denies there are differences in cables, I have news for you.
There are vast differences.  I just switched interconnects between my CD transport (Cyrus) and DAC (Schiit Gumby), and the result was transformational.  Every possible parameter was improved: better definition, better soundstaging,  better bass, better depth etc.
I can’t understand how any audiophile with ears can deny the differences.  Is it delusion or dogma?
128x128rvpiano
@ron1319

No, what @devilboy is saying is that a *cable* (not a signal modification device) transmits the signal from point A to point B without any modification or attenuation.  Cables that *sound* a particular way - irrespective of what the particular sound is - are doing more than conducting an unaltered signal from Point A to Point B.  This is a simple truism since Cable A cannot, based on physics, sound different (much less "vastly" different) than Cable B unless one, or both, are significantly altering the signal.  Altering the signal is a **fault**, not a feature, in a cable.  Now if you want to use cabling to alter the presentation, have at it, but realize that they are, intentionally, designed to be tone controls.  Nothing wrong with that (well, except for marketing hype) if that's what floats your boat. 
Are audioquest cables considered high end? If they are- consider me a cable junkie. They make my old equipment really sing. 

I have superb interconnects: 3 separate runs of plutonium tubes filled with cryogenically treated snake oil unshielded of course so I can see the radioactive glow in the dark. They sound out of this world.
https://www.audioholics.com/audio-video-cables/the-truth-about-interconnects-and-cables
Audioholics, now that is funny. They make a difference. Not that I care, but IMO those that can't hear a difference have never tried.