Interconnects and non-believers

jazzdc,

Your analogy seems to presume a rather huge level of incompetency in cable design. 

Cables seem to have been well designed to transmit hi fidelity signals for a great many years, so I'm not sure why a system is likely to end up so compromised.

In cable terms, what for instance would equate to "dirty socks?"

Glory be--I needed a cuppa and a lie down--I agree with something
GeoffKait said !!!!--Cables are NON directional well in my system anyway -no sonic difference (SE) Chris Sommovigo --who's cables I use
spoke the same tongue.

Re the Transparent Music link "Boxes" Corey Greenberg cut one open
some time back-- the Pic should be on Google search somewhere.

T212

This morning I was exploring SVS Sub interconnects. I was referred to their Soundpath shielded sub cable. One reviewer wrote this candid comment:

“I was using coat hangers for speaker wires before (just kidding), what a difference these cables made to my sound system. I can hear instruments and voices that where not audible before. I’am very pleased with the quality and performance from these cables. Highly recommended.“

https://www.svsound.com/products/soundpath-rca-audio-interconnect-cable

@johnread57I note the statement that the cable was directional. Directional only because one end was earthed at the source end thus grounding EMI and RF. I note some poster's claim all wire cable is directional, but I still do not understand why...

I want to be a believer as I want the best sound I have Para A23 NAD51 Bryston Pii I have interchanged Audioquest Cinnamon Coffee and Diamond USB bbetween Bryston and NAD There has been zero difference in the sound wuality between the three cables The Coffee made the sound louder I have also ugged in a RS Dimitri with Shyunta Zitron Python again no difference in sound whether plugged in wall or Dimitri What could posdibly be wrong with this I had someone else listen as well and they didnt hear any diffetence