@prof
and thinking that others could not hear it... is a sin of thinking that your hearing is as good as anyone else’s... or that their hearing is not better than yours or better trained than yours.
A sin of logic omission combined with projection.
You are very smooth with your straw man projections, very nicely couched.
But make no mistake, they are still straw man projections, moments of pronounced airs of superiority in their undercurrent. The kind of subtleties that make it very obvious that you know something, at the very least, about couching speech in terms that are missed by most.. as being the linguistic subtleties that they really are -which is ’manipulative techniques’ in literary expression. Some might call it Machiavellian, even.
In some circles it’s called ’neuro linguistic programming’. You keep committing logical fallacies that are long tailed in written scope, where it takes more than a single point in analysis or thought for some to see.
Yeah, speaker break in seems a lot more plausible to me.It simply means that you can’t hear it..
I’m not sure though about the magnitude of the effects. I never noticed speaker break in on any speaker I’ve owned, (and I’m a careful listener) so I just have to infer what I can from outside information.
and thinking that others could not hear it... is a sin of thinking that your hearing is as good as anyone else’s... or that their hearing is not better than yours or better trained than yours.
A sin of logic omission combined with projection.
You are very smooth with your straw man projections, very nicely couched.
But make no mistake, they are still straw man projections, moments of pronounced airs of superiority in their undercurrent. The kind of subtleties that make it very obvious that you know something, at the very least, about couching speech in terms that are missed by most.. as being the linguistic subtleties that they really are -which is ’manipulative techniques’ in literary expression. Some might call it Machiavellian, even.
In some circles it’s called ’neuro linguistic programming’. You keep committing logical fallacies that are long tailed in written scope, where it takes more than a single point in analysis or thought for some to see.