Carver and Tube Life

Almarg,  I’d be curious to hear your thoughts on this?   Thanks!

Hi Stickman,

Thanks for your question. It so happens that I had addressed that exact question in a post dated 11-17-2017 in this thread, although in connection with a different Carver amplifier. What I said was as follows:

Regarding the statement by Mr. Carver about the 50+ year longevity of the power tubes in his amplifier, I would point out that in general there are statistical approaches that are commonly used in deriving published MTBF (mean time between failure) specifications which produce misleading results.

For example, many of the mechanical (non-SSD) hard drives used in computers have published MTBFs of 1,000,000 hours. Or in the case of some Western Digital Gold Drives I recently purchased, 2,000,000 hours. 2,000,000 hours corresponds to 228 years of continuous operation. Does that mean these drives can be expected to last anywhere close to that amount of time? Of course not. What it means (and I’m choosing the following figures for purposes of illustration) is that if say 100 drives are operated simultaneously one of them can be expected to fail after slightly more than 2 years.

Similarly, **if** Mr. Carver’s 50 year figure is based on similar statistical methodology, and given that there are 12 power tubes in a stereo pair of these amplifiers, it would mean that one tube can expected to fail after a bit more than 4 years.

On the other hand, though, if we assume an average of say 1 hour of use of Mr. Carver’s amplifier per day his 50 year figure would correspond to 18,250 hours. I suppose that if the tubes are driven very lightly, and his design includes good soft start provisions, numbers approaching that figure might not be totally unreasonable. For example, I recall reading that the Western Electric version of the 300B power tube, when used under recommended conditions, can last for 40,000 hours. (I’m not sure, though, if that applies to the original 1930s version, or to the relatively recent reissue, or to both).

In any event, personally I would consider Mr. Carver’s claim as simply indicating that the KT120 and KT150 tubes that are offered with the amplifier will last considerably longer than in most other applications.

Best regards,
-- Al

...And that's why we love you Al!

Al, thanks for that analysis.  It’s difficult enough to pay that much coin for a ‘statement’ tube amp, then spend thousands over the next ten years re-tubing it.  But, if I understand your comments the tube replacement rate for this amp would most likely be considerably less than most high powered tube amps.

On that thought.  If you’re driving a power hungry speaker such as the Magnepan 20.7 or the new 30.7, assuming other parameters are equal does it make sense that an amp like the Silver 7 would lead to more sonic joy?  My current mono amps, the Carver Black Beauty 305’s, pump out about 350 watts into the Maggie’s 4ohm load.  A pair of Silver 7’s would more than double that wattage, close to 900 Watts!  Typically does that doubling of watts lead to a more powerful and bigger sound field in your room?   The 305’s don’t strain or struggle with the 20.7’s, but the 30.7’s add a significant amount of area to the speaker membrane, about 25% more bass panel area specifically.  Maybe more power equals better bass overall, a larger and even denser sound field, and a greater ability to push that Huge Power Response into a bigger room.  My room is fairly large at 21 x 29 x 11.

Thoughts?