Perfect Path Technologies: Omega E mat


I’m curious about this product from Perfect Path Technologies and would like to hear from those that have experience with it. I’ve bought and used the Total Contact enhancer and like what it does for my system so I’m interested in hearing how this Omega E mat performs. 
t_ramey
jafreeman ...

I've tried stacking three mats under each component. The effects are cumulative. The noise floor drops significantly with each mat. Is there a limit where the SQ diminishes? Who knows? If so, I haven't found that limit yet. 

I haven't tried placing them side by side. 

I found that having the magnetic side facing up toward the bottom of the component gives a slight improvement in SQ. 

The above comments refer to my system only. I suspect that Steve Fleischer is doing some experimenting. Maybe he can add to this. 

The clarity brought about by these mats is astounding.

Frank 
I have not experimented with the E Mat magnetic side down, away from a component or panel breaker box.

However, I can confirm that I tried stacking one pair of E Mats under equipment and in the panel breaker boxes only (I couldn’t use the E Mat under or above my mono block amps). There was a subtle but noticeable improvement stacking them under my thin bottomed preamp/phono stage more so than doubling at the breaker box panel, the isolation transformer or the CD player. Doubling E Mats improved the sound in all locations though.

I am witholding full comment overall until I have a few days trial with the E Mats because I don’t want to sell them short. The 24 hour improvement was significant. The 1 hour improvement was very important because initially, despite the previously noted improvements in resolution, transient response, frequency extension, dynamics and pacing, there was a glary, bright upper mid-range and a subdued, reticent sounding lower mid-range when initially installed at six locations. I found a simple solution to eliminate the bright/subdued mid-range problem by moving my SR HFT 2.0 side wall speaker locations down 1/4", which brought superb balance back (down to warm, up to brighten).

Now, as I indicated, I need to give the E-Mats time because it is usually the mid-range that adjusts last and I may have to restore the SR HFT 2.0s back to the initial pre-E Mat installed positions (same with breaking in new cabling).


@t_ramey you are correct I have not used the TC product. I've experimented with too many interconnects, speaker cables and power cords, therefore, I wanted to keep the playing field neutral.
I've reread the thread trying to decide the first location to try the E Mat either under the Dac, Transport or the High Fidelity MC-6 Power Distributor which powers the Dac, Transport, Preamp and FM tuner. I'm open to suggestions but I believe you experienced users are going to suggest under the MC-6, am I correct?
lak,

I may try one on the house circuit breaker box with placement over my 3 dedicated audio breakers.

ozzy
That's a tough one, Lak.  You may have to experiment with placement, but that's not very tough to do.  I would try the DAC or Preamp first, then move it back to the distributor after a few days to compare. You are going to like this thing.