2. analog
  3. 136945-114449

Micro RX 5000 Renaissance?

It may be just a coincidence, but looking through the various reports of the recent Munich high end event I've noticed no fewer than four (!) different turntables that all look suspiciously like the Micro RX-5000.

TW Acoustic and Kuzma launched new models visually 'inspired' by the RX-5000 design, Acoustical Systems showed a table that looks like an exact copy and DB Systems (www.micro.nl) also showed an exact copy, leaving no doubt of its objective by simply calling it 'The Tribute'. And then of course there already was the TechDas AirForce 5.

Does anyone know more about these newbies and what's under their bonnets? It would be interesting to compare their performance vis à vis the original and hear how much technology has moved forward. Or not.

While I'm a happy owner of the RX-1500G, the RX-5000 has been on my radar for quite some time. So with this Micro Renaissance going on, should I wait for a mint original to cross my path or should I go for one of these new tables? It seems Micro enthousiasts are now spoiled for choice........

edgewear
nandric's avatar
nandric
4,086 posts
 

The so called ''intellectual property'' seems to be accepted at

present but the ''liberals'' were against because of privatisation

of ''science''  which is considered to be ''common good''.

The ''investment argument''  won so those rights are limited

qua duration and under condition of fees payment for the

duration time . Aka the time to earn the investment back. There

 is no ''universal legislation''  so nearly each country has its own

regulation, This means that claiming a patent in China imply

 Chinese patent law.

nandric's avatar
nandric
4,086 posts
 

As by cartridges one can say ''the construction is simple but

the execution is not''. I assume that balancing the platter is difficult

as well the (needed) precision of bearings and axle. The added

''problem'' is the choice of bearings: inverted or not?

I could ask Dertonarm but am reluctant to bother him at present.

bluewolf's avatar
bluewolf
66 posts
 
@invictus005
"Every single clone or fake part should be banned, confiscated, and destroyed by customs. I don’t care how old the original is."
So true. So true. So I take it you are all for paying China royalties for all foreign produced tea and alcoholic beverages, all products using gunpowder, paper and all printing......

And best not mention how the Poms stole tea plants from China to start tea growing in India.

"They have no moral compass and even clone $0.03 transistors."
And good to see you condemn the whole nation for the transgressions of some. So tell me what you think of the moral compass of the whole of the US given the agonizing deaths as a rsult of this one business profits decision?
https://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/22/business/2-paths-of-bayer-drug-in-80-s-riskier-one-steered-overse...

amg56's avatar
Ag insider logo xs@2x
amg56
887 posts
 

Now why did all the Capitalists move their business offshore to China, along with IP so they could build it? Where did China get it's taste for Capitalism from? Ok, call it Communo-Capitalism, but it's producing more billionaires per year than any other country. They are hard working, opportunistic and clever. I am not jealous, and have worked with them sorting out their traffic in the big cities. I have seen their industries. Wow. May be the western world has gotten a bit lazy in comparison.

I am not commenting on their Government or the way the upper-echelons of their business exploit their workers. Who is brave enough to change it? They are the new economy...

nandric's avatar
nandric
4,086 posts
 

Think in terms of ''cost of production''. Labor is one of them.

This explains ''capitalist investment'' in China. In the time

that both Sovjet Union and China were ''socialist countries''

there was no investment of either in the other country.

More to discover