Blocking the propaganda


I have a friend who lives in the boondocks who is without question the foremost expert in this Country on a certain vintage turntable. I will leave the particulars out so as to avoid making him the focus of this discussion or letting someone else figure out who I am talking about. He said something to me recently that I always knew on a certain level but have not seen "transparently" until his comment. His statement is this; "audio magazines including Stereophile are useful for birdcages and if you run out of toilet paper and nothing else". This was in the context of discussing Mike Fremer's preference for 9" arms. I have concluded that he is absolutely correct, but only for those who have the guts to really dive into audio with open eyes and willing to expend the effort to focus all of their attention and for lack of a better word, devotion, to figuring out the truth for themselves. This person I speak of has unquestionably done that. He has engineered his own products that make his turntable of choice as good as it can get. He thinks outside the box. Convention or "accepted thought" mean nothing to him. The analogy that comes to mind is wine. I know of many who will not buy a wine unless some critic has given it a 90 or above. When someone points out how silly it is to rely on published numbers from someone they don't know, they claim that they rely on experts and numerical ratings because they lack the patience, time and resources to taste wine options for themselves. What it boils down to is intellectual laziness. I intend to filter out 100% of what I read in magazines and even audio boards as absolutely unreliable. I have no doubt that I will fall short, but it is a lofty goal nonetheless. We all ought to forge our own trail(s) with sweat and effort and open minds and avoid laziness. Apologies to those who don't appreciate sermons. 
128x128fsonicsmith
I was under the assumption this thread is supposed to be about blocking propaganda, not spreading it. Like a manure spreader. 
+1 last comments by glupson, tomcy6. I don’t think comments made by geoff are propaganda or have to do with propaganda. They always strike me as childish fits, like those of a 5 yr old boy, meant to draw attention to HIM. There are many people here at AG who don’t really care about the topic, they just want others to notice them, talk about them.
Another bloviating manure spreader joins the fray. But why? He doesn’t ever actually say anything, other than lob dud grenades at your friend and humble narrator. Oh, well, what’s another stalker or two? If I was baiting you I did an excellent job. 🐟

My favorite oxymoron? Military intelligence.
@glupson- This place is relatively tame in my experience. I did a lot of legal work in the era when the Internet was first exploding, and I dealt with a variety of characters, from hard core hackers to people involved in various crimes that would fit into the ’cyber crime’ category today.
Don’t take any of it personally. Just find your niche here-- there’s plenty of give and take where you can get good information or exchange ideas. Audiogon remains a good forum despite it’s somewhat kludgey format and the moderators seem to be ok too- not too heavy handed unless really necessary.
Most of Geoff’s pokes and prods aren’t particularly nasty-- I wouldn’t read too much into it.
I think the philosophical threads are an open invitation to controversy but really, I don’t see this thread as particularly harsh or venal. That may not be worth anything to you- just trying to help put this into perspective.

@geoffkait- that line was from George Carlin, no?