What is more accurate , the fozgometer or the diplay of the oscilloscoop

Neither Mikey nor I are perfect.  He wrote (among many other words):
"Were the stylus perfectly aligned with the cantilever, cantilever perpendicularity to the record surface would guaranty minimum crosstalk and correct setting of azimuth."

He left out what is going on at the other end of the cantilever.  As I said, if the magnets are not correctly aligned around the vibrating cantilever/coil assembly, then too, the cartridge will not achieve best crosstalk when the stylus/cantilever are perpendicular to the V-shaped groove.  So, in sum, he left out the bit about the magnets; I left out the point that he makes above and elsewhere throughout his paper.  Put us together, and you've got a more complete story.


Read more at http://www.analogplanet.com/content/crazy-little-thing-called-azimuth-part-1#VtqFlkIgexQq2XZJ.99

I like to thank you all for your input , I do think now the fozgo is a very accurate tool , that is the question now for me can you adjust your
cartridge in the way that left and right output are exactly the same ?
My problem is the Dynavector te kaitora rua , when I adjust the cartridge to get a near output of both channels , the cartridge angle is oblique .
I think the cantilever is out of adjustment , perhaps by the use of a tangial arm .I replaced the arm by a Holborne normal arm ,bought another 
cartridge , the Dynavector DV XX2 MK 2 , and now I have perfect values measured . The kaitora will be checked here in Holland by v/d Hul.

forgive my ignorance, but what's a DMM
Thanks

@frothy Digital MultiMeter

Thanks Folkfreak,I enjoy reading older threads,lots of good info out there. Appreciate the answer.