Actually no, you haven’t at all. You’ve attempted to engage contributors here in wagering. The moderators deleted those posts. You’ve also made claims about the group, but then failed to substantiate them. For example:
... The only thing that qualifies as "dogma" around here is the notion/statement that "my power cable sounds better than yours because I say so!" which gets repeated over and over and over ... .....not to mention "I don’t believe in science!
No. Again for those who lack adequate reading comprehension skills, I said that I would take part in a "wager" IF there was an acceptably scientific study done on the power cable debate and I stand by that. I never proposed any specific wager, and in fact, another user put an actual $$ figure out there - I believe it was $25K. Yet you don’t have any problem with that. Hmmm....can you say.....CONFLICTED? or.....HYPOCRISY? or.....POT CALLING KETTLE BLACK?
Complain about my language all you want but that has no bearing on the good faith of my argument.
And you’ve manufactured other claims, such as this:
One of your fellow snake oil believers said that my study proving power cables don’t make a difference was too old - 14 years.
You think I manufactured that claim? You didn’t see the post where someone questioned the veracity or legitimacy of the link I provided because it was 14 years ago? I’m sorry if you’re also hard of seeing, but it’s there and the burden of proof is not on me to prove it, as anyone with any kind of computing device can simply go back through the comments on this thread to verify that indeed it’s there. In fact here it is, by @cleeds (i.e. YOU):
Back on the subject, I’m glad you asked:
https://hometheaterhifi.com/volume_11_4/feature-article-blind-test-power-cords-12-2004.html
So your claim about not being able to distinguish between power cables power cables in a blind test is based on someone else’s 14-year-old test?
Why do you feel the need to lie and obfuscate, then report my posts to moderators when you don't have a valid or effective counter argument?
Once again, simply saying things over and over doesn’t make them true. I’m the one attempting to engage in good faith debate here, you and yours are doing the exact opposite and you’re apparently willing to lie or overlook things that actually happened in order to make your "point"....which is????
What IS your point here?