Do ClassDAudio Amps Have Proper Decay Of Notes?


I'm interested in the ClassDAudio kits. Has anyone tried them? I had a tripath amp once and it had a liquid, detailed quality that I liked but it was too fast with the decay so ultimately sounded a bit fake, even with a tube pre. Full-bodied, lush, but too fast. I've heard the Hypex modules from Holland have nailed the decay issue but they're miles out of my price range. Just wondering if the ClassDAudio kits are close in terms of decay.
uberdine
An amp that I would consider to be a true 'digital amp' would be one where the process of conversion from digital to analog happened only at the output, IOW that the entire circuit is one big DAC.

@atmasphere - interesting.  I could be wrong, but my reading of the Lyngdorf integrated (and other "digital" integrated amps that are now coming out such as the new NAD DirectDigital) would seem to match this architecture.  As best I can tell, there is no "analog audio stage".  It seems like they are using the actual digital pulse output of the DAC chip to drive the amplifier output transistors.  In this sense, the amplifier power output stage is essentially acting as the "DAC I/V" stage (basically bypassing all the analog and preamp stages in between).  It's really not a "digital amplifier" because it is still an analog translation (which is required in any sense of audio anyways).  I could be completely wrong here, but this is what I am assuming based on how they are describing the product. 

I'm not sure how well this actually works.  Some people just love the Lyngdorf, but I would actually want some sort of Class A discrete analog stages in between to help shape the sound and reduce the square wave effect of the DAC pulses - in addition to providing a very strong signal to drive the impedance of the amplifier.  I think the Lyngdorf could be very crisp/clear sounding for some people, but I think it could go too thin and solid state sounding.

@auxinput   If that's really the case, the problem is that the switching frequency is too low because its only at the frequencies of the digital codices. And I can tell you from having designed Class D amps that no DAC out there can drive the outputs directly- so there is likely a level shifter and driver circuit as well. Since the codices are such low frequency, a converter of some sort would have to be employed, along with some sort of computer control (like @ostensible mentioned earlier) to switch from one algorithm to the other. Otherwise the distortion of the amp would be quite high; funny that distortion can be low with digital but if you switch at that frequency distortion is unacceptable.


That's why I don't think there is a true digital amplifier out there.
Everyone: There’s a bit of confusion here.

The OP is only concerned about products from one given manufacturer, namely Class D Audio out of Anaheim, CA.

The OP could not care less about opinions about class D topology for amplifiers.
^^ Yes, that was certainly not obvious since buying a class D audio kit is pretty easy to do. It seems that a company name like that would cause a lot of confusion in the marketplace. It probably can't be trademarked.
As for NAD: I believe they started to move away from the DirectDigital idea, and forward to a new hybrid technology which in part is based on Hypex. 

The NAD D3020 is one such hybrid. The current master series multi-channel HT amp is purely Hypex. 

Best,

E