Ohm Walsh Micro Talls: who's actually heard 'em?

Tvad,
Yeah, I had a feeling that might be the case. If you are correct, then I'll be sticking with the Micros for the forseeable future. I cannot afford a new amp AND new speakers any time soon.

The 100s will probably work as good or better than the micros with your amp, but you may well be tempted to go with a bigger amp at some point to realize a real benefit.

Another thing to consider and maybe ask John S. about is that the micros are recommended for near field listening in any room size on the OHM site and the larger Walshes are recommended for general listening in various size rooms.

That's because the larger OHMS are just bigger and CAN go louder for listening further away when feasible in a larger room, but for more nearfield listening in a room your size, there will not be much if any difference with a larger model I suspect.

USing the Musical Fidelity A3CR (120w/ch) I've had my big OHM 5's in the 12X12 room where the 100's are currently. There was no real benefit with the larger OHMs. When I had the 100's in the larger room where the 5's are, there was....mainly the low end had more weight and balance and was more fulfilling at higher SPLS. Other than that the 100s sounded very much like the 5's overall.

I suspect the same would be true in your case with the 100s compared to the Micros.

Yes, you've basically expressed my thoughts on this. When John told me that the 100s could play "four times as loud" as the Micros, I actually laughed out loud, because in my room, the Micros can play louder than I can stand! :-) That said, as far as "nearfield" listening goes, my room configuration makes it impossible for me to sit more than 10-11 feet away from the speakers, maximum.

Agree with Tvad that larger drivers that also may extend a bit lower will generally work better near field as well as long as long as the room is not too small in which case the low end on the OHMs can become overwhelming according to some.