2. amps-preamps
  3. 137906-33344

NEEDED!!! Bi Amp Pros out there that can give me some advice

Ive never Bi Amp'd before and I would like to try it out. I want to avoid costly mistakes so any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Aragon 8008 bb would keep for the lows
Pass Labs Aleph 5 Amp looking to buy for the highs
Dunlavy SC 3's
PS Audio Perfect wave DAC no longer using a preamp
HSU ULS 15's sealed in Stereo two of em 
Tice Power block signature.


The 8008 BB is 200 at 8 ohms and the Dunlavys are 5.5 nom. The Aleph is rated at 60 wpc at 8 and 90 at 4. So I guess Id be running around 70 wpc with the PASS at 5.5 non load. Since Im running XLR out I would either have to y split the XLR's outta the PS Audio or use concurrently with RCA's that the PS audio will do. but I know that changes things on output impedance. So Im hoping some of ya guys been down this path and will help me out. Thanks in advance for any feedback
128x128haywood310
auxinput
2,920 posts
 

What are you after?  That Aleph 5 is a pure Class A with output of 60 watts per channel (8 ohms).  The Aragon 8008 BB has a bias of 26 watts into Class A (which is pretty high for a typical Class A/AB amp).  However, the Aragon is going to be able to push more current and bass power overall, due to bigger power supply, etc.

I have heard the Aragon.  It is a nice amp, but it is voice VERY warm.  I don't really know what the Aleph sounds like, but based on

Is the Aleph 5 running out of gas on your speakers?  Or are you looking for something that supposedly has better sound quality? 

The Krell FPB amps are likely to have much more resolution, attack and detail than the Aragon.  However, that Krell Class A is going to be a very "creamy" sounding Class A, especially in the mids with piano and voices.

I think the Pass Labs XA series is not going to be "creamy" like the Krell, but I think it may still have an element of warm sounding sonic signature.  It may have more resolution than Aragon (which is VERY warm sounding).

mikepowellaudio-old
38 posts
 
Yep, if you dont want an OCD rabbithole dont go biamp, because you know there is Triamp right ?  For sure youll want an active crossover to do it right and someone mentioned Room treatments, do not take this suggestion lightly. Rooms without treatment are for listeners not serious about their music reproduction. Rooms sound HORRIBLE with zero treatment. (no comments about my room has no treatment and sounds great, it just means you think horrible sonics sound great) I am about to Quadamp my rig in roughly 30 days when my custom 4 way hand built active crossover arrives. Because nobody makes them .. LOL talk about ignoring signs. Sometimes for me anyways I just got to pedal to the metal whatever I'm working on. Either way itll be one
hell of a ride !
cerrot's avatar
cerrot
1,700 posts
 
You do need an active, external crossover - and there is not much better.
clio09
3,360 posts
 
Rooms without treatment are for listeners not serious about their music reproduction. Rooms sound HORRIBLE with zero treatment. (no comments about my room has no treatment and sounds great, it just means you think horrible sonics sound great)
This is probably one of the most ridiculous statements I have read on here. Not that room treatments are a bad thing, but that can also be a rabbit hole waiting to happen. I have been there, done that, and bought the t-shirt with room treatments, and like anything else, if you plan carefully you can achieve very good results.

Now the idea of using a super amp is a sound one, but careful planning dictates that you need to get the amp/speaker match right. Not difficult really, some research and auditioning should get you there. Those who mentioned the use of an active crossover are providing sound advice when it comes to bi-amping. It is also the approach I took.

Roger Modjeski at Music Reference recommended the bi-amp approach to me with my Quad ESL 57 speakers. He actually sourced the 8" drivers for me and I built my own woofer boxes. I use a Luxman M-02 for the low end and a set of direct drive amps or OTLs for the top end. The active crossover is a Beveridge RM-3 that has low and high attenuators so you can adjust the gain accordingly. The low and high pass boards in the crossover are 100 Hz 4th order Linwitz-Riley. I have 4 small footprint woofers placed in an asymmetrical array around the room. Two can work as well. The array helps eliminate the room nodes. You can read more on the concept here:

http://www.audiokinesis.com/the-swarm-subwoofer-system-1.html

Also, please read the post by Roger Modjeski (ramtubes) on 9/2/2018 at 12:40pm in this thread:

https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/autoformers-the-benefits-in-matching-amp-to-speaker

Roger is one of the best designers in the business and his experience in bi-amping has helped me achieve the best sound I have ever had in my system. Oh and BTW, once I set up my distributed woofer array I was able to ditch all my room treatments. As good as my room measured with treatments before the change, they measured better without them.
bdp24's avatar
bdp24
9,953 posts
 

@clio09, really interesting to hear you are using a quad of 8" woofers with your Quads. Did you go sealed, or ported? If sealed, about a 1 cu.ft. box? I’ll bet it’s the same woofer Roger uses in his Music Reference ESL’s (which I’m dying to hear), ay? Ain’t it great to have Roger posting on AudiogoN of late? I REALLY miss his AudioCircle Forum (which can still be accessed).

By the way, Rythmik Audio and GR Research now offer an 8" model of their OB/Dipole Sub, which is the same as the 12" model but with less output. Great with planar speakers, of course. I have no doubt four 8’s is better than two 12’s, for the well-known reasons. Better to deal with bass modes acoustically than electronically! ---Eric.

More to discover