What improvements did you hear in going from entry level to high end Audio?


I heard more detail. Better transparency and detail 
calvinj
So actually....
  I have 3 systems in my house.  2 of them are Surround Sound systems tha I regard as mid fi.  I didn’t start off planning to have two Surround Sound systems, but for a few years I had adult children living in my basement on a rotating basis and I cobbled together a system down there for their entertainment, hoping to keep them down there and out of my hair.  It’s been a few years now since we’ve had extended stays...
  My two channel system in a relatively small bedroom upstairs is my high end system, although judging by the standards of some here it would be considered mid Fi.  Speakers are B&W 803 D (the first with Diamond Tweeters, from roughly 2004).  Current Pre Amp and Power Amp are both Parasound Halo, John Curl.
I have 2 DACs—a first generation Mytek Manhatten and Bryston BDA-3.  3 Digital sources—Sony 5400 ES CD/SACD player, Oppo 203, and Bluesound Vault2.  Another digital source is my MacAir with Audirvana +.  I have a Synology NAS which I currently control with either the Bluesound or the Oppo.  I sold off my Vinyl Rig a year and a half ago, but it’s latest iteration was a Clearaudio Concept turntable and mc Concept cartridge with a Musical Surroundings phono Pre amp.
  I am not sure that you would care about the two Surround Systems, but here goes,minus the monitors.  My living room has a 10 year old Onkyo receiver.  Digital sources are an Oppo 105 which is also the DAC for the Bluesound Node2 and the latest generation Apple TV.  Speakers are Silverline Minuets as fronts , a Silverline center speaker, (these used to be rears until my wife got tired of every room in the house looking like a AV emporium) crossing over to a Paradigm sub at 80; rears are in Wall Paradigms..  The room for this system is fantastic, a perfect shoebox rectangle, and the only reason that it doesn’t house my 2 channel is that my wife spends a fair amount of time here (her space-she watches a bit more TV than I do, sits here with friends, etc).  And although the equipment is more prosaic here, I’m always impressed and just how good this system sounds when I have the house to myself and get to experiment.
  Basement surround: Speaker fronts are Silver Panatellas (long discontinued floor-standers), Center is aBoston Acoustics, and so are the rears.  Pioneer Elite Pre Amp outputting to Parasound 5 channel power amp, and a Pioneer Elite DVD/SACD Player connected to the Pioneer receiver by “I Link”.  A cheap Sony BDP, another ATV and Bluesound Node2.  This system has to compete with my Forced Air furnace which is one noisy sucker, so that and potential flooding concerns exclude this from ever being the main listening area.
I just made the jump from a typical college dorm/bachelor pad system from the 1980's to a system that probably cost around $20k 10 years ago.

Of course there is a difference and it is not subtle. At the same time I do not find it life altering and I would never consider spending $20k on an audio system.....even as I get more and more into this hobby....which, in many ways and like many hobbies can get bat crap crazy real fast.

Just look at noromance's response, which is a nice, thoughtful and honest response. However, if someone is asking what the difference is between high and low end, they are very unlikely to have any notion of what things like speakers disappearing are, or improved colors for different instruments (when we don't know what an instruments's color is to begin with), or what congestion is.

We might can form an idea of what stage depth means and what detail entails. We might wonder why we want to hear a cough in the audience.

He also mentions minute changes to system easily heard. I've struggled with this. And that fact makes me feel like I just don't get it....until I come to audiophile forums and find people insulting each other's mothers over the merits of cable burn in or expensive power cables....all of whom have $20k+ systems.

Not knocking his response. I'm sure it is spot on for audiophiles but maybe not for those planning on being audiophiles.

And there is a whole language that you have to learn in order to discuss all this too. And even among the best audiophile writers it seems like the language and terms are inadequate....not that the critic or writer isn't competent but just that words often can't describe what they're hearing. And subsequently you hear a lot of those terms over and over again to describe various components and tweaks....which makes you wonder if they're real or worth the $1000 you just spent on speaker cables (like mine).

My advice as someone jumping in: don't overthink sound quality that you are happy with. Don't become unhappy with what you have because someone else says theirs is better or even worse because someone wants you to buy what they make. Remember, the economy, and especially the audiophile economy, runs on dissatisfaction. For me, I don't want or need another hobby that keeps me in a constant state of dissatisfaction and envy especially when that dissatisfaction is based on largely subjective observations and personal preference.

Having said all that, I am happy with how my system sounds, I find it intoxicating, I enjoy listening more and find myself finding more time in order to do it. And having said that, I can still listen to my 1980 Toshiba receiver driving 1990's Bose bookshelf speakers and really, deeply enjoy good music....and to be honest....still be amazed how good they sound!
That you have to get the speaker amp marriage correct or nothing else matters. What amp(s) does your speaker designer use? Might be a good way to get there.

noromance covered all the "sonic" improvements, which leaves the matter of involvement, immersion, suspension-of-disbelief, excitement, ability to discern the artists "intent" (for those who, Like Art Dudley, think playback equipment can affect such things), and, most importantly, increased musical comprehension (of complex music like Beethoven Symphonies, and J.S. Bach’s Concerto For 4 Harpsichords And Orchestra, the latter placing great demands on a system’s ability to unravel the individual threads of a dense musical weave).

Of course, the quality of a system's abilities in purely sonic terms affects the above too.