Jazz for aficionados


Jazz for aficionados

I'm going to review records in my collection, and you'll be able to decide if they're worthy of your collection. These records are what I consider "must haves" for any jazz aficionado, and would be found in their collections. I wont review any record that's not on CD, nor will I review any record if the CD is markedly inferior. Fortunately, I only found 1 case where the CD was markedly inferior to the record.

Our first album is "Moanin" by Art Blakey and The Jazz Messengers. We have Lee Morgan , trumpet; Benney Golson, tenor sax; Bobby Timmons, piano; Jymie merrit, bass; Art Blakey, drums.

The title tune "Moanin" is by Bobby Timmons, it conveys the emotion of the title like no other tune I've ever heard, even better than any words could ever convey. This music pictures a person whose down to his last nickel, and all he can do is "moan".

"Along Came Betty" is a tune by Benny Golson, it reminds me of a Betty I once knew. She was gorgeous with a jazzy personality, and she moved smooth and easy, just like this tune. Somebody find me a time machine! Maybe you knew a Betty.

While the rest of the music is just fine, those are my favorite tunes. Why don't you share your, "must have" jazz albums with us.

Enjoy the music.
orpheus10
Post removed 
O-10, there is a long history here of that kind of double standard on your part. Most times I’m in the mood to let it go by and simply say “There goes O-10 again”; sometimes I’m not. No need to escalate matters now, just as there was no need to start them. If you need to feel the way that the latter part of your comment states, I’m fine with that and would never make a similar comment; if anything, for the sake of civility. Let’s just say that the assertion is news to me now just as it was every previous time that you have felt the need to make that comment; and, in keeping with your initial premise I could not disagree more.

However, I’m always for escalating matters as concerns the discussion of the music and its details. So, just what about what I wrote re those two “Misty’s” is incorrect in your opinion and why? I welcome your thoughts, and peace.
Sometimes it goes like this - there is peace to be found on the other side of war. I hope it's not the case, at least not fully.
Anyway, the best posts of music are mine.

Frogman, you seem to have a problem with "nuance" and feel; that is something I can not put into words. The public, the people who buy records decided on the "Misty" I presented a long time ago; that's the standard by which other vocal versions are judged.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQ-JgK9h_MU



Conducted by Quincy Jones and His Orchestra with Zoot Sims on Saxaphone, "Misty" is a jazz standard written in 1954 by the pianist Erroll Garner. Originally composed as an instrumental following the traditional 32-bar format, the tune later had lyrics by Johnny Burke and became the signature song of Johnny Mathis. This song is from the album "Vaughan and Violins".

Sarah's accompanied Quincy Jones & His Orchestra: Marcel Hrasko (alto saxophone), Jo Hrasko &William Boucaya (baritone saxophone), Richard Davis (bass), Kenny Clark (drums), Ronnel Bright (piano), Zoot Sims (tenor saxophone), and Michel Hausser (vibraphone). Recorded in Paris, France July 7, 1958. (Mercury Records)

Look at me
I'm as helpless as a kitten up a tree
And I feel like I'm clinging to a cloud
I can't understand
I get misty just holding your hand

Walk my way
And a thousand violins begin to play
Or it might be the sound of your hello
That music I hear
I get misty the moment you're near

You can say that you're leading me on
But it's just what I want you to do
Don't you notice how hopelessly I'm lost
That's why I'm following you

On my own
Would I wander through this wonderland alone
Never knowing my right foot from my left
My hat from my glove
I'm too misty and too much in love
I'm just too misty and too much in love



It's absolutely impossible for a trio to compete with that musical lineup.