why do people feel the need to buy expensive cable

glennewdick,

"No mater what side of the fence your on with cables looks has something to do with it as well."

I have been trying to point that out on a number of occasions. Interestingly so, anything else on cable threads gets debated to the ridiculous extent but I do not remember anyone ever reacted to my statements that have been, more or less, just what you wrote above. I think  people here are ashamed to admit they function on the "looks" level, too. On the other hand, given the ferocity and style of some of the responses on cable threads, I should not complain that I got no responses.

I did buy interconnects because they did look "better" than previous ones. I have stock wheels on my cars. I do try different tires, though.

That’s so deep. We should call you the Kosmetic Kid. 

Looks are important glupson.  That’s why you will never see a pic of GK anywhere.

Good looking gear has always outsold high performance gear.

"The male of the species is a visual creature", one might say.

We have been asked multiple times to make our cables more ’pretty’ as they would be easier to sell, and more would be sold.

We have not, as every bit of prettiness and shininess we have at our disposal to add in, degrades sound quality. We (at Teo) can’t -and won’t- issue high quality cables with the ’shiny crow attractants’ involved, unless it is purely functional.

So far, for us, only the good looking WBT reference connectors have passed this high audio quality smell test.

We are very very good with cosmetics and visual appeal in product execution and design. The two of us (Taras and I - Ken) are well versed in such, with decades of experience. But there is little to be done in the cosmetics arena, with cables, if sound quality is the aim and outcome.