Kal & Bob,
My latest room is difficult and correction in the bass is a must for any speaker I've tried there, despite extensive room treatment. (I've had the P/Es in 5 other rooms over the last 10 years - this is a first.) More grunt isn't really the issue - it's less lumps, if you will. When placement of the P/Es is optimized for smooth bass in this room, it's not only still a mess, but the monitors end up too close to the listening position and - as a special bonus - I lose about a half octave of extention (relative to the best extention that I've achieved with the P/Es in previous rooms).
I've happily been using Ohm 100s and Velodyne SPLRs & an SMS-1, but I'd love to be able to switch back to the P/Es from time to time. Therefore, the idea was to cross-over from the monitors at Verity's recommended 150hz and eq the Verity bass modules. A pre-pro with room correction would allow both of these functions - if the x-over meets the description in my OP. My preferred amp is an ARC VT130se (balanced in only - no phase splitter), hence the XLR requirement.
If the NHT x-over allows XLR connectivity, it would work with the SVS/Audyssey bass only version or my SMS-1. However, the description of the x-over function in the C-1 provided by Mglenn is intriguing in that a really flexible high pass - coupled with the low pass in the SVS/Audyssey, or SMS-1, would allow me to rotate lots of different combos of speakers and subs/woofers at will.
The pice equation gets interesting, too.
1)NHT with my existing SMS at $200, or adding SVS/Audyssey at $700 = $900.
or
2)C-1 at $2K plus SVS = $2,700 with greater flexibility and potential to add multi-channel/video later.
or
3)balanced Audyssey equalizer at $5K (adds full range RC and multi-channel potential down the road with a pre/pro of my choice)
or
4) single ended audyssey eq at $2.5 K (adds full range RC and multi-channel as above, but I need to use a different power amp)
or
5) sell the Parsifal/Encores
Since I have a HT "movie" room with a recently added Audyssey enabled Integra AVR, the flexibility of #2 becomes a bit less appealing. I consume music (software) fairly voraciously and the idea of building a multi-channel library feels a bit daunting. However, knowing myself, I might end up doing just that at some point (particularly since the only reason I use my HT room is to watch "Lindsey Buckingham at Bass Hall", which is the only dvd - music or movie - I find sufficiently compelling to warrant multiple viewings. Otherwise this is my wife's territory). If I ever build a multi-channel music library, I'd definitely want to utilize my existing compliment of music hardware, rather than the movie room. That fact makes #2 more appealling.
All food for thought. Thanks all for the input.
Marty