"An ideal speaker system should have phase response linear with frequency, which in simple terms means that all frequencies produced by the driver reach the listener’s ear at the same time. "
This statement seems vague and lacking specifics. I am not sure what they mean by "reaching the listener's ear at the same time". May be written by the marketing department. :-)
As Tom said, the only way to prove that a speaker is time-phase coherent is that it can produce a pulse response. You could come up with a lot of reasons as to why a certain speaker is time-phase coherent, but at the end of the day, it has to be able to produce a proper impulse response. And I think I've read somewhere that there is a law in which stated that in order to legally advertise your speakers as "time-phase coherent", it has to prove that it can produce a impulse response.
Ideally there would be a single driver that can produce 20Hz - 20kHz but since such a driver does not exist, one has to use electrical filters, and all all filters have phase shift. Some choose to optimize in frequency domain and some choose to optimize in time domain.
Another things that often overlooked in Thiel design is the geometry of the baffle which I believe was designed as such to reduce the effect of diffraction and I don't think one can underestimate how it helps the speakers disappear. It definitely adds to manufacture cost and I don't think Thiel did it just for the look. When I see a lot of high end speakers that basically just have a rectangular and square shape I kind of frown ... I am sure they could do a lot better.
It seems like Thiel products for some reasons produce a lot of polarized opions - you either like it or you hate it - at least that's the sense I got. I haven't heard all their products, but I appreciate the technologies behind their designs.