B&W 805 or Monitor Audio Silver for Creek 5350SE?


I'm looking for some feedback on speakers for my new system, which is a 1st gen. Creek 5350SE, Marantz SA8001 SACD player, Dual CS5000 turntable with Grado cartridge, Home Depot 12 gauge speaker wire and handmade interconnects. I'm currently running vintage Heybrook HB2s purchased new around 1980 (square tweeter plate), and wish to upgrade. Based on Stereophile reviews, I've wanted B&W 805s for years, but I'm not sure the 5350SE can power them. An option would be the Monitor Audio Silver RS6 for 1/2 the price (rave Stereophile review, powered by Creek 5350SE amp & Creek CD player), but I read in Agon forums that RS6's are bright, which quite frankly sets my teeth on edge.

So two questions:
#1- is 85 watts/channel enough power for the B&W 805s in a 12'x16' listening room?
#2- are the Monitor Audio Silver RS6s fatiguing to listen to (bearing in mind I like my Grado cartridge)?
If it helps, I'm planning to switch to Audioquest King Cobra interconnects in the near future because they're recommended as a good match for the Marantz SA8001.
I'd appreciate any experience-based input anyone can give me on this.
sc0ttc00ter
I have an older pair of 805s and I would think that the Creek would work very well in a room that size. I have found that the 805s will take quite a lot of power, I have driven them with my Meridian 605s which have 150 watts a channel. But they are now in my wife's system being driven by a 50(?) watt NAD integrated and will easily fill a room your size.
Get the 805S. It's a better speaker overall compared to the Monitor Audio. I've heard the MA silver series few years ago and those speakers have thin midrange and lacked body, hence the perceived brightness. Answers to your questions:-

1) It is sufficient unless you are looking to crank up the volume to serious head-banging levels

2) With the Creek there may be listening fatigue. In the long run you would be better off with the B&Ws.
Thank you, Stanwal and Ryder, for your input. I suspected that the B&W might be a better speaker for my tastes, but that glowing review for the RS6 (powered by the same Creek amp that I own) got my hopes up.

Is anyone else out there running the B&W 805n or 805s with a Creek 5350SE, and if so, have you a preference for speaker cables that will bring out the best of both components?
I have listened carefully to all this gear, but none of it together.

Here are my impressions.

The Creek is a neutral to dry sounding SS amp. It does what you ask without fuss and has a surprising amount of power.

The RS6 is a very nice speaker for the money, no question about it, and can sound very good driven by even modest electronics. But it is NOT overly warm - more exciting.

I was frankly surprised when I read that RR loved the Creek/Monitor Audio combination. Dryish amp with mid-fi metal tweeter? I can't question what he likes, but I think RR has a love thing going with Creek gear.

The 805s are very, very detailed. Beautiful looking and sounding when properly driven and sourced. A classic. They can also push the resolution of your gear upstream. For example, I have heard them sound very unflattering when driven by an Arcam Solo, where the B&W 705s sounded great with the same. Sometimes too much information is not a good thing.

With that said, the Creek should have plenty of zip and finesse to run the 805s and the Marantz CD should round things out nicely. I would go with the 805s because they will sound very good now, and give you even more enjoyment if you decide to upgrade your electronics at a later date.

Try the Home Depot wire for starters - but I would lean away from silver wires with this set up.
Thanks for the silver wire tip: I'd come to the same conclusion myself.

As another speaker option, how about Dunlavy Audio Laboratories SC-IV loudspeakers? According to what I've read, they're pretty neutral, have decent bass, and they're in the same price range as used B&Ws. Will 85 watts per channel be enough to drive them?