Perfect Path Technologies: Omega E mat

Listening to some of my "B List" CDs--older digital productions that always fell short of my sonic preferences--eg, David and David, "Boomtown", Santana "I-III", Stephen Stills "Stills", et al.  I am not disappointed with any of these now--more added value from the Omega E mats!    

jafreeman,

I know what you mean, with the mats, my system brings out the best in all my CDs, not just the well recorded/audiophile approved ones. I recently got a CD of Carlos Kleiber conducting the Vienna Philharmonic in Brahm's 4th Symphony. It's an incredible performance, but a digital recording from the early 80's. Now it sounds great too!

Tommylion,

Do you feel that your mats have now plateaued in performance, and are they holding steady?  Interesting now to hear reports from a longitudinal perspective.  Did you end up stacking some of your mats--how does that compare to a broader field arrangement--if you had the space to try that at all?  I look forward to soon adding to my four mats.      

My mats have been in place, untouched for 11 weeks now. The sound quality is at least holding steady, possibly still improving. I have made one other change in my system recently (surrounding my tweeters with jute matting, nice improvement) so it's harder to tell.

I have two mats (vertically stacked, magnet sides facing each other) under each component (including my CPT 300 power unit) and on top of each speaker. I also have two mats, side by side, on my main power panel.

I haven’t tried any other configurations, because this one is working great, and I don’t want to mess with it.

Great report---I can imagine the sound as still improving with your area of coverage and "field saturation" of components.  Spreading or stacking of mats, or both.