Does anyone care to ask an amplifier designer a technical question? My door is open.
Hello Roger, I've purchased your tubes several decades and liked the quality and longetivity. Funny how people denigrate my Marantz 7T although I only use it for 78 rpm phono stage. It sounds much like a 7C. My Dynaco ST70 on my second system has magnificent bass as it was modified from its ultralinear design to a voltage regulated design (taking off the 2nd transformer tap). Added very large storage cap, ss rectification but kept the tube for soft start. Just a wonderful low powered amp. My friends and I have found some early ss receivers with low power are superior to higher power receivers in the same line. E.g. Yamaha CR 620 is superior to the CR 1020 and higher power receivers. The Sherwood 7100 is superior to the 7200 and 7300. They have fewer stages on the low powered units. I use the Yamaha for video/audio systems although a friend uses them on his Legacy Focuses. Even the Sherwood brings out great low and tight bass on Legacy Signature IIIs (its shocked the seller when I used it to audition them). I really like your answers on many of this forums questions. There only place where I strongly disagree is in the use of premium fuses. My amps had standard fuses replaced by SR Blue fuses. The difference in SQ was very substantial. The manufacturer of my big amps went one step further and replaced his fuses with circuit breakers. Now his amps sound nearly identical (we can't tell the difference) from my amps with the SR blue fuses. He is a huge skeptic and this is his only tweak to his system. I'd like to know what you opinion is of the VAC IQ (continuous autobias) amplifiers. They sounded great wherever I heard them and they appear to be conventional designs well executed. They must have good impedance outputs to make them adaptable to drive many types of speakers. I heard those Jadis amps on new Magico speakers (maybe the S3 or Q3). I wondered why the highs were rolled off and soft sounding. Probably due the loss of power in the highs. Terrible sounding. |
Many people believe that SET tube amplifier give more mid range magic than Push pull tube amplifier.The reason for this is because most SET amps act like tone controls. Here is a typical, response graph of a set amp into a very easy Kanton simulated load. It’s the wavy line. Here is the Jadis SE 300B monoblocks. Fig.1 Jadis SE300B, frequency response at 1W into 8 ohms (top at 10kHz) and into simulated speaker load (right channel dashed, 1dB/vertical div.). https://www.stereophile.com/images/396JADFIG1.jpg Note: how much higher the 700hz to 2khz (midrange) is compared to the rest, there’s your midrange emphasis and your tone control response. The straight line is what it does into a fixed 8ohm resistor,, which no speaker is. Cheers George |
HI, Roger here with a question. I would like to hear how each of you figured out how much power you needed to buy in watts? I would appreciate the following information in your response. Your listening level LOUD SPL (preferably measured at 1 meter from the speaker with a REAL SPL meter. Your low listening level. If you are using a cell phone app then you have confirmed it? Your speaker sensitivity? Listening Distance from speakers? How many watts at your load is the amp is rated to supply? |
@shkong78 Many people believe that SET tube amplifier give more mid range magic than Push pull tube amplifier.Do you agree on the notion as designer of tube amplifier?If so, could tell me why it is so? There are some things about SET amplifiers that can be magic. I have always found the simplest circuit that can do the job well will do it best. Here are some things that are special about SET amps
Not all SET amplifiers are good, they are often light on specs. The important specs are
Explore the idea of Bi-amping with a line level crossover. We have developed a nice mono amp where the crossover is built in. The bass part is push pull about 15 watts and the top is SET at 2.5 watts. Because IM distortion is eliminated less power is required. |
