A problem with AC Power you may not have considered.


My posting is not about a stereo system but it is related to AC Power, from which all stereos draw power. Read on, I am sure you will find this interesting. I certainly did and it caused me to rethink and replan AC Power to my stereo.

At my real job as an electrical engineer, I manage a cross-disciplinary engineering team for a large energy company.   We make large, residential green energy management systems, a size that borders between most large homes and utility companies. A few months back, we released a new product to the 230VAC single-phase market (Australia, Europe, etc.) and recently introduced the same product to the 240VAC split phase market (USA, Canada, etc.).   In addition to a slew of UL, IEC, IEEE, CSA, TUV, and other safety codes, we also had to meet FCC Class B emissions (which all your digital audio equipment must also meet) and also meet FCC Susceptibility requirements (which digital audio does not have to meet, unfortunately).  

Since the two products are almost identical, I thought we could leverage what we learned for the 230VAC unit onto the 240VAC unit.   Well, this is where the impact of grid power to our stereos comes into our interest.  

The emissions requirement is of two parts, of which you may be familiar. One is radiated emission, which is the noise the product broadcasts into the air. The second part is conducted emissions, which is the noise the product injects onto the power lines and runs throughout your house and probably into your neighbors as well.  

The 230VAC unit passed emissions, which I expected as we did a lot of design work to make it pass.   The conducted part was a concern, since that injected noise is from the equipment our vendor produces, not something we designed in house. Well, when the certified testing house tested conducted emissions, it failed.   A couple of weeks of debug later, at 2K$ per day, the problem was solved when I suggested they test with the grid connection running through 8 feet of steel conduit, since all installations have at least 8 feet of conduit.

Fast-forward six months to the 240VAC testing, which took place here in the USA. Surprisingly, the unit failed conducted emissions, even though we used the same 8 feet of steel conduit.   Another week of debug, again at 2K$ per day, we stopped testing since it was clear a new design is needed to fix it. I designed a 50 Ampere Balanced LEMP Filter that had over 50-dBm isolation in the affected frequency range.   Problem solved.   So, why did 8 feet of conduit fix the problem one time and not the next? A good question.  

I took the same 8 AWG THHN wire we used to connect the unit to the grid, ran it through the same 8 feet of 1 ½ inch steel conduit, and rented some high frequency test equipment. In the conduit we had two 8 AWG wires for Line 1 and Line 2, one 8 AWG wire for Neutral, and another 8 AWG for Earth ground.   I ran a bandwidth test from Line 1 to Neutral and tied the conduit and Earth wire to earth, while the other Line wire floated. The test started at 60 Hz, which I referenced as 0 dBm and I ran the test all the way to 30 MHz.   The generator produced 10Vrms, the level I checked at each step, and fed a 50-Ohm load.   To my great surprise, I had a 2-dBm rise at 10 MHz where it began to roll off and was only 2 dBm down at 30 MHz, the limit of the test generator.   In other words, that length of pipe and THHN wire had a bandwidth of +/- 1 dBm from 60 Hz to 30 MHz!   Whoa! We are allowing a ton of injected noise into our systems!

To prove that, I grabbed the power supply from an analog stereo amplifier and fed the test signal through the cord, fuse, transformer, and measured the bandwidth on the secondary.   In spite of a UL/CSA approved transformer, it was surprisingly transparent to the test signal.   Throughout the test spectrum, it was never more than 6 dBm down and it peaked in a couple of areas, too.  

Our homes usually don’t have grounded conduit, what most homes have is Romex wire.   That stuff is transparent to radiated emissions and we live in a world of radiated emissions. Think cell phones, FM and AM radio, TV broadcasts, all the communication frequencies, plus who knows what we have for the dirty noise injected by electric motors. Think your fridge, your AC unit, your furnace, ceiling fans, light dimmers, electric vehicles (that is the reason they don’t usually come with an AM radio these days!), the list can go on for a long time.

For my stereo system here at the house, I built a smaller version of the LEMP filter, added additional suppression, along with 20,000 Amps of surge protection. I am also installing a dedicated earth ground as well.   However, you don’t have to home brew – you can purchase equipment that meets the local safety codes and is LAB certified to meet multiple suppression standards. These units have strong filters in them to clean up line power. There are replacement AC line cords on the market that contain RF suppression.   I don’t suggest you get a new mortgage just to buy AC noise suppression equipment or new line cords, but I do suggest you do something to kill those RF demons.  

Look for equipment that has at least 30 dB of suppression from 100 KHz to 15 or 20 MHz. Thirty to forty dB is the range where most emission problems fade away, so that is a good starting point.   Some equipment has lightening suppression as well; look for an IEEE spec stated in joules of energy, the more the better with a test pulse of 8/20 microseconds.   Don’t be afraid to stack some of the equipment in series.  

The lighting in your listening room can also matter a great deal. Stick with plain, old school incandescent bulbs; avoid the CFL’s, LED’s, neon’s, light dimmers, and other lights that require power supplies to run.   Incandescent bulbs are very quiet, which is why they appear regularly in emission anechoic chambers.   Although digital equipment is less sensitive than analog equipment, it is not immune to susceptibility.   Vacuum tube equipment usually has an edge over solid state, too.  

I hope what I wrote is of help to you in your quest for improved sound.  

Robert
128x128spatialking
BTW, I am using three extension cords on the right channel 200W Conrad Johnson amp.  It is really a kludge setup but far better than using that other outlet.  If I use the wall receptacle next to it I get a lot hum for reasons I have yet to determine.  The fix this weekend is to replace the extension cords with a single 8 AWG cord 25 feet long. 
" Stick with plain, old school incandescent bulbs"
Getting harder and harder to find at Home Depot. I could always just listen in the dark.
If I use the wall receptacle next to it I get a lot hum for reasons I have yet to determine.
Likely different circuit and a ground loop.

Stick with plain, old school incandescent bulbs
Haven't a problem with a dimmer since the '70s. I use two LED torchier lamps on dimmers and there is ZERO difference in the noise spectrum when viewed on a 'scope. Of course they are not on the same circuit as the HiFi.
I don't want to get into a situation where I am reviewing equipment but I will try to answer all your questions. 

Here is the PS Audio device: https://www.psaudio.com/dectet-power-center/  There are no specifications given so I have no idea how much attenuation it provides, what frequency range it attenuates, or anything like that.   The parts in the photo do look appropriate, though.
The Furman IT-REF 15l and 20l do have excellent specifications throughout the bandwidth that needs filtering.  If you have the budget, these look very promising.  Certainly I would feel confident plugging one into my system given the published specifications and the fact it was tested by an independent testing lab.  Amazon has the 15l for $2500 and $4000 for the 20l.  As I said before, if you want to get serious about EMI it also gets expensive.  

The Equitech also looks very good: https://www.equitech.com/productsold/son-of-q-shelf-or-rack-mounted-chassis-systems-2/ All torridal transformers provide good high frequency isolation since it doesn't have interwinding parasitic capacitance that are inherent with the typical E style transformers.  I found it online at $2640.   The Equitech didn't say much about filtering and surge protection, it has it but I don't know what it has or how effective it is.
The thing to understand here is there is no one perfect product, if one addresses the problem, most EMI problems will fade.  I doubt you would go wrong with any of these but do understand you get what you pay for.  So, don't expect a $200 power strip to equal these EMI dreadnoughts!  Given what I have seen here, I'd say buy one of these and forget about EMI issues.  

Case in point - a number of years back I was working for a very large, well known test equipment company, of which I am sure everyone knows the name.  We were pushing the bandwidth limits a standard FR4 controlled impedance PCBA could manage, so we made a test board with exactly a 50 Ohm line, a line with 10% error, a line with 30% error, a line with 50% error, and a line with no controlled impedance whatsoever.   What we found was even the 50% error line had reasonable performance while the one with no control was not usable.  If you address the problem, even with error, you are far ahead of the game than ignoring it.

One of the nice benefits from these units is they monitor the line and shut down during long term brownouts or over voltage conditions.  The utility companies have specifications on this sort of thing, call "ride through" where the user equipment can ride through the brownout or surge without self destructing.   Back when I worked in audio, I knew a few audio companies tested their products for this but I doubt the majority do.  The idea is products have a given ride through while the utility companies work to prevent problems that exceed the general ride through spec.

I didn't look at the regenerative products such as the big ones from PS Audio.   These are an entirely different animal since your system is now powered from the power supply / amplifier / inverter contained within.  The grid becomes secondary and not really in the picture.   Unless you have horrible line regulation, you probably don't need to go to this extreme.  

One thing is for sure, I would definitely spend $400 or $500 on EMI filtering and surge protection before I would spend $400 or $500 on spiffy line cords.  Ignoring the awesome cosmetic improvements they provide, this equipment is very real and very effective.   On the other hand, if you want really spiffy and sexy looking power distribution after you buy one of these ..... :-)
..a couple of years ago a lightening strike took out one of my Vandersteen amps (right side) in my 5A speakers. The amp was repaired and sent back.  I don't know when, but for a couple of years, I've been hearing a noise (resonance sounding at certain frequencies) in my left speaker that appears in the left even after changing speaker cables,  - on phono and Cd.  When I plugged the amp into a different outlet in the same room the sound gets much better, but the resonance remains in the left speaker.  I took the tweeter and mid out and sent them to Vandersteen who declared them "fine"  I sent them the bass amp, and the crossover and they came back "fine"...the resonance remains.   I don't know where to go from here.   Any suggestions?