Hi Roger,
To use your example of 28.28 volts RMS into 8 ohms, corresponding to 100 watts, the corresponding RMS current is 28.28/8 = 3.54 amps.
Assuming a sine wave, the peak voltage is 28.28 x 1.414 = about 40 volts.
The corresponding peak current is 3.54 x 1.414 = 40/8 = about 5 amps.
The corresponding instantaneous peak power is 40 x 5 = 200 watts.
What Kijanki is saying is that the term "RMS power," if strictly interpreted, would imply 200 watts peak x 0.707 = 141.4 watts RMS. But of course what is really being referred to when that term is used is the product of RMS voltage and RMS current, which as you indicated is 100 watts in this example.
So the widespread use of the term "RMS power" is, strictly speaking, a misnomer. That is Kijanki’s point, with which I agree.
Regards,
-- Al
To use your example of 28.28 volts RMS into 8 ohms, corresponding to 100 watts, the corresponding RMS current is 28.28/8 = 3.54 amps.
Assuming a sine wave, the peak voltage is 28.28 x 1.414 = about 40 volts.
The corresponding peak current is 3.54 x 1.414 = 40/8 = about 5 amps.
The corresponding instantaneous peak power is 40 x 5 = 200 watts.
What Kijanki is saying is that the term "RMS power," if strictly interpreted, would imply 200 watts peak x 0.707 = 141.4 watts RMS. But of course what is really being referred to when that term is used is the product of RMS voltage and RMS current, which as you indicated is 100 watts in this example.
So the widespread use of the term "RMS power" is, strictly speaking, a misnomer. That is Kijanki’s point, with which I agree.
Regards,
-- Al