That would be instaneous power or instaneous heating, agreed?
Yes.
The RMS ... defines its DC heating value.
Yes.
The RMS also defines how power varies as a function of time ...
Well, if the waveshape is known, for example if it is known to be a sine wave, then of course one can determine the amplitude of that waveform from the RMS value. But I don’t see how my statement that you were referring to is contradictory, as you claimed. My statement, once again, being as follows:
... what the words "RMS power" literally mean is the RMS value of a waveform that defines how power varies as a function of time.
Honestly, I think you may be misreading my statement.
Would you care to tell me why an amplifier producing 100 watts RMS is any different than an AC generator producing 100 watts RMS.
The 100 watts is the same in both cases, of course. I have never said anything that is in any way to the contrary, and as far as I can recall neither has Kijanki.
And then please where 141 watts comes from. What kind of inbetween power is that to be called?
As I have said, it is the RMS value of a sinusoidal power waveform having a peak value of 200 watts.
There are 18 complaints about this article on the talk page of which 13 and 14 pretty much kill the whole thing. If kijanki learned this from articles like this then he is in the same mistaken camp. Shall we leave him there?
The fact that the article has numerous flaws has nothing to do with the subject matter of this thread. And Kijanki is a very experienced engineer who doesn’t need any such help.
I have nothing further to say on this matter.
Regards,
-- Al