Thank you, halcro. Â Fascinating comparison. I have never owned a Grace cartridge, but am well aware of their reputation. Â A few years ago I posted several comments on the ET2 thread about my experiences with this Acutex. Â I found it to have some very interesting traits including excellent dynamic nuance and some of the best controlled and tuneful bass that I had ever gotten from my ET2. Â
The Acutex is not a âbeautifulâ sounding cartridge. Â Switching to the Grace is almost shocking, first impression is of a much more refined sound. Â With the Grace every individual instrumentâs tone up to the upper midrange is more âbeautifulâ. Â The perspective is more closeup and the Acutex more distant. Â The overall sound is larger and much juicer compared to the Acutexâs much drier sound. Â
However, the Grace can sound a little thin and forward from the upper mids on up.  The harpsichord seems to get thrown forward at times in a way that seems unnatural.  The Acutex keeps the harpsichord in better perspective relative to the other instruments.  It has a way of separating musical lines in a way that allows the listener to better understand the composition.  While the overall sound may seem too dry and colorless (music has color), I find that after one adjusts to its âsoundâ it is apparent that it does a better job of creating the illusion of instruments playing in a real space even if the space itself is not particularly attractive sounding; a dry, non-reverberant space.  The sound with the Grace always reminds me that it is a recorded sound; a sound recorded in a larger more  reverberant space. Â
If Iâm looking for the ear candy aspect of listening the Grace wins. Â If I wan to listen to the music without my audiophile hat on the Acutex wins.