Thank you, halcro. Fascinating comparison. I have never owned a Grace cartridge, but am well aware of their reputation. A few years ago I posted several comments on the ET2 thread about my experiences with this Acutex. I found it to have some very interesting traits including excellent dynamic nuance and some of the best controlled and tuneful bass that I had ever gotten from my ET2.
The Acutex is not a “beautiful” sounding cartridge. Switching to the Grace is almost shocking, first impression is of a much more refined sound. With the Grace every individual instrument’s tone up to the upper midrange is more “beautiful”. The perspective is more closeup and the Acutex more distant. The overall sound is larger and much juicer compared to the Acutex’s much drier sound.
However, the Grace can sound a little thin and forward from the upper mids on up. The harpsichord seems to get thrown forward at times in a way that seems unnatural. The Acutex keeps the harpsichord in better perspective relative to the other instruments. It has a way of separating musical lines in a way that allows the listener to better understand the composition. While the overall sound may seem too dry and colorless (music has color), I find that after one adjusts to its “sound” it is apparent that it does a better job of creating the illusion of instruments playing in a real space even if the space itself is not particularly attractive sounding; a dry, non-reverberant space. The sound with the Grace always reminds me that it is a recorded sound; a sound recorded in a larger more reverberant space.
If I’m looking for the ear candy aspect of listening the Grace wins. If I wan to listen to the music without my audiophile hat on the Acutex wins.