@ramtubes
I could really use some help betting a better grasp of amplifier/speaker interaction. Specifically, in what sense a speaker is "easy to drive" for an amplifier.
This seems to generally relate to two parameters:
1. Speaker sensitivity
2. Speaker impedance (and phase angles etc).
I’ve seen speakers with higher sensitivity but lower or wilder impedance termed "easy to drive" and speakers with lowish sensitivity but higher and smoother impedance being "easy to drive." So I’m trying to get a grasp on what it means...in practical and possibly sonic terms...when a speaker is "easy to drive"for an amplifier and what you get when trading off sensitivity vs smooth impedance.
To turn it in to a practical example:
I owned the Thiel 3.7 speakers. Here are the Stereophile measurements:
https://www.stereophile.com/content/thiel-cs37-loudspeaker-measurements
Note the 90.7dB sensitivity, but with it seems a fairly challenging impedance.
Then take the Joseph Audio Perspective speakers (a speaker I’m considering):
https://www.stereophile.com/content/joseph-audio-perspective-loudspeaker-measurements
JA measured a low 84dB sensitivity but with a higher/smoother impedance he deemed them "a very easy load for the partnering amplifier to drive."
So I’m trying to understand the practical/sonic consequences - higher sensitivity, vs lower sensitivity but an easier impedance load. What does this mean for the power requirements, or type of power for each?
I have Conrad Johnson 140Wside tube monoblocks
https://www.stereophile.com/content/conrad-johnson-premier-twelve-monoblock-amplifier-measurements
And I’m wondering which of those speakers would be "easier to drive" with the CJ amps, why, and in what sense.
(FWIW: the CJ amps seemed to drive my Thiel 3.7s great: tight, non-flabby base, etc).
Thanks for any wisdom you can impart!