Denafrips Terminator 6Moons Blue Moon Award 2017: "A 'Budget-Priced' True Reference DAC"
Perhaps the word 'Reference' isn't important....
BTW, the DAC in his stable for the comparison was the Formula and not the La Scala. Let's continue what you quoted above:
"Right there, at ¼th the Formula's price but with added DSD, the hammer fell....Ultimate transparency opposes ultimate body. It's bone versus flesh. Our Formula sat closer to the transparency polarity. By definition, this meant a slightly leaner more lit-up lighter presentation. The Terminator moved over a bit to the opposite pole. This included more voluptuousness and weight. Quite by design, it mellowed whatever glare the Formula couldn't exorcise on poor productions. Audiophilia calls that more forgiving. It means that more of your bad recordings sound better. Only radicalized audiophiles call that irrelevant."
Full page linked here for acknowledgement and reference:
https://6moons.com/audioreviews2/denafrips/4.html
Yup, Third Person works like a charm. First person be torpedoed. : )
Heck, one reviewer, whose opinion I respect was mightily confused by this DAC. These are points in time, with very specific systems during those periods, not necessarily optimized ones to a specific component. So my findings are different than Srajan's. This is coming from a guy who values Srajan's take on gear and has purchased based on his recommendations. I will be purchasing a speaker he loves, in a few days. I also find it interesting and curious that Srajan is searching for amplification that offers much of what he "found" the Terminator's strengths to be, in his system at that time, for his current fave system.
I'm a high resolution listener and I'm saying I have been able to get the resolution you are likely looking for, at a fraction of what you are looking to spend. I can easily and inexpensively make this DAC lush, but I would not want to, nor have I.
Over the past year, many warm and less resolved components, including speakers, components, cables, etc. have found their way out of my system. The Terminator has stayed. I can easily make it less musical and focus the spotlight on the details...but that's not what I want or am about.
Far easier to get a resolved system than a highly resolved and highly musical system. The Terminator plays that way more difficult hand well.
My proposition saves you around 12K or more new. The Terminator sells well on the used market and your loss will be minor. The Rockna, or the others,...well... : )
That 12K bought me a reference level 2A3 amp and preamplifier.
And yes, I did actively consider both DACs on your list: the Rockna and Aqua; as well as the EMM Labs DA2.
I believe the Rockna will be the better option, given what you have shared, than the Formula xHD, that is if my 2 cents hold value, for you. : )
All the best.
Perhaps the word 'Reference' isn't important....
BTW, the DAC in his stable for the comparison was the Formula and not the La Scala. Let's continue what you quoted above:
"Right there, at ¼th the Formula's price but with added DSD, the hammer fell....Ultimate transparency opposes ultimate body. It's bone versus flesh. Our Formula sat closer to the transparency polarity. By definition, this meant a slightly leaner more lit-up lighter presentation. The Terminator moved over a bit to the opposite pole. This included more voluptuousness and weight. Quite by design, it mellowed whatever glare the Formula couldn't exorcise on poor productions. Audiophilia calls that more forgiving. It means that more of your bad recordings sound better. Only radicalized audiophiles call that irrelevant."
Full page linked here for acknowledgement and reference:
https://6moons.com/audioreviews2/denafrips/4.html
They are opinions I'm repeating.
Yup, Third Person works like a charm. First person be torpedoed. : )
Heck, one reviewer, whose opinion I respect was mightily confused by this DAC. These are points in time, with very specific systems during those periods, not necessarily optimized ones to a specific component. So my findings are different than Srajan's. This is coming from a guy who values Srajan's take on gear and has purchased based on his recommendations. I will be purchasing a speaker he loves, in a few days. I also find it interesting and curious that Srajan is searching for amplification that offers much of what he "found" the Terminator's strengths to be, in his system at that time, for his current fave system.
I'm a high resolution listener and I'm saying I have been able to get the resolution you are likely looking for, at a fraction of what you are looking to spend. I can easily and inexpensively make this DAC lush, but I would not want to, nor have I.
Over the past year, many warm and less resolved components, including speakers, components, cables, etc. have found their way out of my system. The Terminator has stayed. I can easily make it less musical and focus the spotlight on the details...but that's not what I want or am about.
Far easier to get a resolved system than a highly resolved and highly musical system. The Terminator plays that way more difficult hand well.
My proposition saves you around 12K or more new. The Terminator sells well on the used market and your loss will be minor. The Rockna, or the others,...well... : )
That 12K bought me a reference level 2A3 amp and preamplifier.
And yes, I did actively consider both DACs on your list: the Rockna and Aqua; as well as the EMM Labs DA2.
I believe the Rockna will be the better option, given what you have shared, than the Formula xHD, that is if my 2 cents hold value, for you. : )
All the best.