elizabeth wrote:
—- lTo me the worst problem is the naysayers often seem to think the folks who can hear the differences are deluded idiots.And make assumptions based on THAT premise.”
Thats only because you refuse to read what some of us *actually* say and you continue to carry around the false equivalence of “being in error” and “bias” with “being an idiot.” It is precisely BECAUSE the brightest person in the room is susceptible to bias-error effects that it makes sense to consider that variable.
So long as you absolutely refuse to even try to understand this point, you will have yourself to blame for your irritation with your own straw man.
—- lTo me the worst problem is the naysayers often seem to think the folks who can hear the differences are deluded idiots.And make assumptions based on THAT premise.”
Thats only because you refuse to read what some of us *actually* say and you continue to carry around the false equivalence of “being in error” and “bias” with “being an idiot.” It is precisely BECAUSE the brightest person in the room is susceptible to bias-error effects that it makes sense to consider that variable.
So long as you absolutely refuse to even try to understand this point, you will have yourself to blame for your irritation with your own straw man.