msetexas
>
IMO & IME... power amps which have great power supplies with an abundance of power storage capacity, are as good or better than those which double down their power with regard to impedance drops.
For ex. Krell vs. BAT amps.... Krell doubles output with a halved impedance load.. My KAV250 went to 500wpc at 4 ohms.
My previous BAT VK500 W/BAT pack opt.... put out the initial 250 as the Krell, but at 4 ohms less than 500wpc.
Theoretically you possibly could drain or use the total 500 or 440 wpc from each amp... but logically, with 89-90Db speakers like BW 803s, continuous power outputs of those levels simply won't occur with logical use.
Even some incidental peaks of high freq under sane listening conditions should fall short of the top rated output of either amp.
So there's that... simple doubling of power output is not indicative of any amp being considered either good or bad. Theres more to it. I sold off my 9NT + kav 250 due to it's sonic signature. Not due to power issues.
The BAT vk500 sounded worlds apart better.... and should have perhaps if $$$ means anything. The Krell then was about $3K new. The BAT was about $5.9 new.
Other than sound, I feel it was the power supply and design topology of the BAT which made that diff for me. KAV 250 = 45lbs.... BAT vk 500 = 105lbs. Where's the beef? it's in the power supplies or isn't. digital amps aside.
If you like Marantz' sound maybe you should look into McIntosh, odyssey, Butler, or ATI. Of those only ATI doubles down power with halved imp, though. All however sound very good.