@ yyzsantabarbara
got the ARC2 from before and it works very well with my desktop system to reduce all negative reflexes you have from the desk, pc monitors and so on. It’s really fun to listen into the mix when you sit very close. Hard to work though! My ATC SCM12 presents a fabulous sound (together with small REL subs) that I’m not shure the TAD can match :-). Always tries new monitors though. Recommend you a try with your KEF:s although I myself find them a little boring (less dynamics, no usable bass and hard to integrate with a sub, low SPL capacity). I have the active LS50 - possibly havn’t given it enough chances.
Don't know though how the ARC2 will work for longer listening distances.
Last night I removed my JBL 6328P monitors from the wardrobe and put them on top of my ATC150ASL in the movie/music room. I’ve had problem listening to the JBL’s as a near-field because they are so brutal. The drums really hurt you and they are a bit edgy (harsh) in the upper mids. Like pro monitors tends to be in general, because they are really a working tool and made to let you discover all faults in a recording.
Putting them higher up I thought would make the sound come from about the same height as the performers on the video. To get a more realistic presentation and fill the room better. Worked! It also took some edge of the speaker. I then started to work with the crossover and the parametric eq in my Yamaha surrond cx-a5000. Put the crossover for the svs-pb16 ultra sub up to 100hz (I normally use 60hz). Reduced -3db at 60hz and -2db at 125 hz to reduce some remaining bass thumbs (used the antimode sytem on the sub before that) and finally reduced -4db at 2,6 khz to make guitars, saxophones and harsh voices a little softer.
I was congratulated by my son to now give him the best concert sound ever!
You never know what you have before you tried to make the most out of it. Speakers, listening positioning and room treatment (manual and digital) is 90% of the sound. The rest just cherries on the pudding. That's my view.