SF Cremona Auditor M vs Harbeth 30.1

I own the SF Auditor M and have been auditioning the M30.1/2. Unfortunately, they are much more similar than I would have thought. After the trial, I thought for sure I would swap, but a day later, I was happy to keep the SF. Both disappeared very well. The SF are a touch warmer and the Harbeths have a bit more drive, which is what I wanted but it’s not worth the swap once I put on some slow blues. I don’t think you could go wrong, but I just don’t want or feel the need to try anything else. I run a VAC integrated and a REL sub in a 12 x 15 room. 

Thanks for your response! It's interesting because I went ahead and purchased the SFs and did the same comparison and had pretty much the same experience..... except the Harbeths won out in end. I think ultimately that's because in my situation the speakers are placed in the middle of a room and the SFs benefit from being closer to a back wall.

I have had my Cremona Auditor Ms for 8 yrs now and have tried to move on to another speaker but can't seem to better them in the sub $8K range.  I had a pair of Harbeth P2ESR in my work office setup nad was very pleased with their performance.  I went to listen to the 30.2 and Super 5 but could not justify the difference after trade-in. 

@dhcod  and @miner42
Thanks so much for your posts. I, too, have the CAM's and while I've been looking at other options for my small, dedicated listening room, all I've found, are speakers which are, at best, (maybe) lateral moves, not to mention the "negative cash flow"  I'd incur.  :) . In addition to the sound of the SF's,  a big plus for me is their physical beauty.