How important is it for you to attain a holographic image?

rvpiano, FWIW, I don’t understand why I would need to apologize to you. The comments in my 1/13/19 post certainly could be construed by someone as negative, but they were not directed toward you. At least that was not my intent. In fact I thought I was agreeing with your earlier observations about Orpheus10’s post, i.e. your substituting ’ignorance’ in place of his term ’happiness’. Should I have been more explicit? Enlighten me if you wish.

I don’t know how anyone reading your comments could construe any thing but that you were calling me ignorant.  “...Just as someone might revel in his......”
“Ignorance” is the antecedent.
However, if you say so, I’ll have to accept that you didn’t mean it as such.

rvpiano, For the sake of clarity, consider that in my ’offending post’ I was directly addressing Goeff, Orpheus10, and yourself, separately. In my comment to you I said "just as someone might revel in his.....",meaning Orpheus10 .Should I have intended this to refer to you I would not have used "his", I would have used ’you or your’. I was trying to convey a contempt, much broader based than yours I think, assuming you were contemptuous at all, but erred in piggy backing on your comment. I should not have done this. For this I do apologize. Sincerely.

Thank you for your explanation. I understand now.
I do value your comments in general, and especially on classical music.

I’ll be happy to get back to our usual discussions. 🙂

"Accentuate the positive, and eliminate the negative"; that will be my motto this year, life is too short to get embroiled in negative harangues.

This is a very important and complex subject; especially if you want to exploit the full potential of recorded music.

My recommendation is to go back over the posts and retain all the positive information while rejecting the negative; this will be extremely beneficial if you want to achieve "holography".