@desktopguy
Scroll down, way down, and check out the photos. The review isn't bad either.
https://www.whatsbestforum.com/threads/harbeth-monitor-40-2.25222/
@desktopguy Scroll down, way down, and check out the photos. The review isn't bad either. https://www.whatsbestforum.com/threads/harbeth-monitor-40-2.25222/ |
I find Harbeth speakers, generally speaking, to be very well balanced. For me they do a nice job across a wide variety of music. Really big rich recordings sound rich, but not overly so. Thinner recordings still have some juice and still sound good. I remember concurring with a reviewer who said something like "With the Harbeth, everything is presented at the correct level. Mixes sound right." |
I can't think of a single voice in audio today that speaks with as much clarity, logic and common sense as that of Alan Shaw. Many, many times I was taken aback by what he had written on the HUG website, only to later find out that he was right... https://www.harbeth.co.uk/usergroup/ |
dhcod, You mentioned, " I like my 30.1s but I want more of everything! More bass for sure. More dynamics too. A bigger image." The M40.2 might be a good a very good option for you, considering you like your M30.1 speakers. That is the exact upgrade I made. You will get more of everything including a more extended defined bass, dynamics , imaging , larger soundstage and most importantly ,a complete full range sound. The M40.1 is also a good speaker. A used pair of these could be a good choice for you. The M40.2 is more efficient ( easier to drive) , room friendlier and more transparent than the M40.1 though. |