orpheus10:
"If class D is so good, why do you need a tube pre? Why not a class D pre?"
Hello orpheus10,
I’m not aware of any class D preamps, either. But it’s my understanding that there’s no sound quality or other benefits to be gained from creating a class D preamp unless the goal is to incorporate some DSP (digital signal processing) functionality into the preamp in addition to the typical preamp functions of a switching control for source selection and a volume control.
Traditional preamps, whether solid-state or vacuum tube driven, are low voltage and wattage devices that typically operate in class A. The normal class D benefits of low electrical consumption, low wasted energy converted to heat and low operating temperature are much less significant with a preamp than an amp. There's also a wide variety of traditional preamps available that each imparts its own unique sound qualities to the total system sound. My opinion is that this is a form of signal processing since it enables consumers to either pick their flavor or attain a more neutral overall system sound
Good quality traditional preamps whether ss or tube, however, have proven to be excellent preamplification devices for very low voltage source signals. They work equally well paired with class D amps as they have for decades with traditional linear amps. provided care is taken to properly impedance match; the general guideline being that the input impedance of the amp should be at least 10x the output impedance of the preamp.
Why not a class D pre? The answer is there’s really no need unless digital inputs or DSP is required on the preamp.
Tim