Why not horns?


I've owned a lot of speakers over the years but I have never experienced anything like the midrange reproduction from my horns. With a frequency response of 300 Hz. up to 14 Khz. from a single distortionless driver, it seems like a no-brainer that everyone would want this performance. Why don't you use horns?
macrojack
I completely understand the difference in parallel and bridged.

I completely understand that parallel amplifiers cannot double the power output. I remain confused that you insist they do.

I saw nothing on the BAT site that explains why their amps do this. Maybe I missed something.

I accept your apology

.
Weseixas asks: "What models are you displaying [at RMAF]?"

Duke replies: My current plan is to show a bipolar model called the Cloud Chaser. It's fairly new - not up on my website yet - but is described in my Audio Circle forum.
If you take 6 different drivers, unless they have perfectly linear transfer functions, they will all have slightly different responses. If they all have the same input signal their responses should smooth to a more linear response.

Sorry, a complete load of crap.

Are you serious? You add up a bunch of errors and the total error is less than any individual error?

You've already embarrassed yourself with your theory about parallel amps. Might be better to retire now and save face.

.
I have a suggestion, I think all those that slate Horn speakers here who have not divulged what speakers they are running should.
I'm running 1000 watts on bass horn 550 on mains. My horns do run fine on low power. But to think only low power is best for horns is wrong. Many audio designers I know run hi power on there horn systems. Doesn't mean I use all this power but the sound quality's of the amplification I choose compliments my horn system.