Why not horns?

JohnK, I might be mistaken, but I thought horns were used more to monitor pop recordings and typical dynamic speakers were preferred for classical recordings.

O.K. you guys- Springsteen's gone - get those wimpy horns out of here and bring in the typical dynamic speakers - we've got a string quartet to record in less than 2 hours.

Or a symphony orchestra with real imaging to capture, and it will probably take much longer than 2 hours to record.

Unsound - Here's one of our problems. I meant that the quartet would be there in 2 hours, meaning there was a setup deadline to meet. However, true to your contentious approach, you had to conclude that I meant it would take only 2 hours to do the recording. And so what if I did? That wasn't at all the point I was making and I'm sure you know as much.

Likewise you have been told numerous times very recently by people you should respect that there is no problem with imaging from horn speakers. Try to let go of your wrong assumptions about horns. You do not know what you are talking about and yet you continue to impose your wrong notions. What's the agenda?

Macrojack, your post could have been interpreted either way, perhaps you should choose your words more carefully. If I knew that wasn't the point you were making, I wouldn't have made such a response.
I expressed my experience with horn imaging, and least one other person agreed with it. I do respect the other opinions. Something you don't seem capable of. With regard to the matter at hand, I posted with regard to my experiences, not my wrong assumptions. Perhaps it's you making the wrong assumptions despite proof to the contrary. How dare you assume I don't what I'm talking about? I continue offer the alternate perspective to your ongoing infomercial. How quickly you've forgotten Newton's third law.