Hi Bob,
See my three posts on the first page of the following thread (assuming you have posts sorted oldest first):
https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/most-important-unloved-cable
I would not assume that a cable having a higher Cat number would necessarily provide better sonics than a cable having a lower Cat number, even if there is a difference. For example, a higher Cat cable is likely to have greater bandwidth than a lower Cat cable. Greater bandwidth will result in faster signal "risetimes" and "falltimes," those terms referring to the amount of time the signal takes to transition between its two voltage states. Faster risetimes and falltimes could very conceivably result in an increased possibility of digital noise finding its way around (i.e., bypassing) the ethernet interface circuit in the receiving device, and coupling via grounds, power supplies, stray capacitances, or other unintended pathways to circuitry further downstream, where it may cause timing jitter or other unwanted effects.
As you’ll see mentioned in one of my posts, a member for whom I have great respect reported several years ago that in his system a considerable sonic improvement resulted from changing a garden variety unshielded ethernet cable to an **inexpensive** shielded type.
I don’t use an ethernet interface in my own system, btw, although my DEQX provides one. Perhaps I will at some point in the future.
Best regards,
-- Al
See my three posts on the first page of the following thread (assuming you have posts sorted oldest first):
https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/most-important-unloved-cable
I would not assume that a cable having a higher Cat number would necessarily provide better sonics than a cable having a lower Cat number, even if there is a difference. For example, a higher Cat cable is likely to have greater bandwidth than a lower Cat cable. Greater bandwidth will result in faster signal "risetimes" and "falltimes," those terms referring to the amount of time the signal takes to transition between its two voltage states. Faster risetimes and falltimes could very conceivably result in an increased possibility of digital noise finding its way around (i.e., bypassing) the ethernet interface circuit in the receiving device, and coupling via grounds, power supplies, stray capacitances, or other unintended pathways to circuitry further downstream, where it may cause timing jitter or other unwanted effects.
As you’ll see mentioned in one of my posts, a member for whom I have great respect reported several years ago that in his system a considerable sonic improvement resulted from changing a garden variety unshielded ethernet cable to an **inexpensive** shielded type.
I don’t use an ethernet interface in my own system, btw, although my DEQX provides one. Perhaps I will at some point in the future.
Best regards,
-- Al