Here we are at half-time in the World Cup Final and I have to revise a comment I made a while ago. I called the Dutch physical. After watching a half where they should have wound up playing with only 9 guys on the field, I want to say that the Dutch are a chippy, chickensh*t, cheating bunch of thugs. Hup yours, Holland.
Why not horns?
I've owned a lot of speakers over the years but I have never experienced anything like the midrange reproduction from my horns. With a frequency response of 300 Hz. up to 14 Khz. from a single distortionless driver, it seems like a no-brainer that everyone would want this performance. Why don't you use horns?
- ...
- 992 posts total
Thanks, Macrojack. Since posting the link, I have "met" one of that paper's authors in another online forum (he and I are disagreeing about something... surprise surprise!). I don't have any experience with either the K-2 or Everest, but I'm sure they're awesome. The original Everest, circa 1985, used an asymmetrical horn to achieve the desired toe-in angle without having to actually toe the speakers inward: Original JBL Everest I borrowed the concept; one of my models uses asymmetrical enclosures to achieve the same end, but with a conventional symmetrical horn. Duke |
Macrojack, I will correct one of your posts regarding my past visitations of the OMA site. I will only say that my "time" visiting with OMA was very short, very educational, and very eye-opening. To say that I would not let my dog lift his leg on the side of the OMA barn would be a gross understatement. Hope this makes my position clear. Nothing against Acoustic Horns. |
- 992 posts total